Use of a competitor’s confidential information

Many businesses try to increase market share by employing a competitor’s member of staff who may bring with them relationships and information acquired over the years.  Employees owe fiduciary duties to their employers meaning, among other things, that an employee cannot make a personal gain by using confidential information acquired in the course of their employment.  If an employee makes a personal gain by using their employer’s confidential information, the employer may be entitled to an account of profits, meaning the employee must pay the employer the amount of profit made as a result of the breach. [Read more…]

Unfair preferences and unperfected security interests

Take the scenario where your company has supplied a customer with goods on credit.  The standard terms and conditions of supply grant your company security over the goods supplied until they are paid for.  In order for that security to be perfected, the interest granted needed to be registered on the Personal Property Security Register (PPSR).  If for example, the interest was not registered or if it was, it was invalid for technical reasons then your company may be at risk. [Read more…]

Is your patent being infringed?

A patent grants the owner (Patentee) exclusive rights to exploit the patented invention (as defined in the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Patents Act)) within Australia.  If another party uses the patent without the authorisation of the Patentee, they will infringe.  In this article we consider the high level issues to consider when attempting to determine whether a patent has been infringed. [Read more…]

Copyright protection time limits change

On the 22 of June 2017, the Australian Government passed the Copyright Amendment (Disability Access and Other Measures) Act 2017 (Act), which introduced major changes to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) that aim to simplify how long materials can be protected by copyright laws.  From 1 January 2019, changes to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) will apply to all literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works (Works), sound recordings and films that are not made public before 1 January 2019, or that are created or made public on or after 1 January 2019.  [Read more…]

Patent revocation for lack of novelty

One of the often cited requirements for a patent to be granted, is that the invention as claimed must be ‘novel’ in light of the information of the day (referred to as the prior art and the common general knowledge) (section 18(1)(b)(i) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth)(Patents Act)).  Put simply, if its been done before, chances are that it may lack novelty.   Therefore, if a patent, when viewed against the prior art and common general knowledge does not disclose an invention that is novel, it cannot be said to contain the required feature of novelty. [Read more…]

Patents and the thresholds for registration

A patent provides exclusive rights during its term to exploit the patented invention.  In Australia the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Patents Act) protects intellectual effort by granting exclusive rights, during the term of the patent, to exploit an invention and to authorise other persons to exploit it.  The owner is entitled to defend the patent against infringement from third parties in the patent area – which in the case of Australia is the Commonwealth of Australia – during the term of the patent. [Read more…]

Introduction to patent revocation

In legal proceedings involving the alleged infringement of a patent, it’s common for the respondent to go on the offensive and attempt to convince the Court that the said patent is invalid.  If proven, it necessarily follows there can be no infringement.  There is no one section of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (Patents Act) that specifically deals with invalidity.  In effect invalidity is established by proving that the requirements of validity set out in section 18 of the Patents Act are not made out on the patent in question, or that there are other grounds (such as sections 40 and 138) which the patent does not comply with. [Read more…]

Top ways to avoid a building dispute in Queensland

From a property owner’s point of view, the vision for the project is finally coming to fruition. From a builder’s point of view, another profit-making job is about to commence……

It is not uncommon for the seeds of a building dispute to already have been sown before a shovel even breaks ground.  Observing the following simple pieces of advice can go a long way towards avoiding a building dispute in the first place. [Read more…]

A director’s duty to act in the best interests of the company: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour

The case of MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 990 involved allegations of a director authorising unnecessary and excessive payments that caused detriment to a company and its shareholders.  This case serves as a reminder to directors of the importance of adhering to their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).

[Read more…]

What is a bare trust?

From time to time we encounter clients that have various types of assets held by a trustee (Trustee) that are purportedly held pursuant to a bare trust (Bare Trust).  There are several questions which usually arise in relation to the rights and obligations of the parties involved that inevitably end up with Dundas Lawyers considering the taxation issues, (in particular the capital gains tax implications, for the Trustee. [Read more…]

Dundas Lawyers
Street Address Suite 12, Level 9, 320 Adelaide Street Brisbane QLD 4001

Tel: 07 3221 0013

Send this to a friend