PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex-parte application for freezing order – absence of good arguable claim for pecuniary relief – freezing order to prevent frustration of prospective costs judgment – sufficiency of evidence of departure from Australia – sufficiency of evidence of removal of assets from Australia – sufficiency of evidence of danger prospective judgment will go unsatisfied – appropriateness of urgent application without notice PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to close court – application for suppression and non-publication order
Related cases
-
Sydney Markets Limited v Latham (Urgent Freezing Order)[2025]FCA 501
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex parte application for freezing orders under r 7.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – consideration of applicable principles – good arguable case for breaches – danger of frustrating prospective judgment – balance of convenience weighs in favour of granting relief Related cases – freezing orders Original article…
-
Zhang v Zhang (No 2) [2025]FCA 98
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – freezing orders – where material change of circumstances since the application for freezing orders – whether circumstances justified variation of freezing orders to require payment into court – order made for payment into court Related cases Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0098For more information, see the original judgement.
-
ATO v Hartley [2025] FCA 322
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders – whether there is a good arguable case for final relief on prospective cause of action for tax related liabilities – whether there is a degree of danger or risk that any judgment obtained will not be met due to dissipation of…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0523
For more information, see the original judgement.
