PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders – whether there is a good arguable case for final relief on prospective cause of action for tax related liabilities – whether there is a degree of danger or risk that any judgment obtained will not be met due to dissipation of assets – whether the balance of convenience favours the making of the orders sought – application granted
Related cases – freezing orders
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hartley [2025] FCA 322
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders – whether there is a good arguable case for final relief on prospective cause of action for tax related liabilities – whether there is a degree of danger or risk that any judgment obtained will not be met due to dissipation of…
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Peever [2024] FCA 1470
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex parteapplication for freezing orders under rr 7.32 and 7.35 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – good arguable case for final relief – danger of disposal or dissipation of assets – application granted Related cases Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1470For more information, see the original judgement.
-
Kocic v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 1386
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where primary judge allowed amendments to statement of claim – whether primary judge erred by misapplying the proper approach to contemporary pleadings in circumstances alleging fraud – whether primary judge erred in finding that the statement of claim did not deploy…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0322
For more information, see the original judgement.
