PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where primary judge allowed amendments to statement of claim – whether primary judge erred by misapplying the proper approach to contemporary pleadings in circumstances alleging fraud – whether primary judge erred in finding that the statement of claim did not deploy conclusory propositions without identifying primary facts – whether primary judge erred in finding that subsequent breaches of freezing orders could be relevant to an intention to defeat creditors – where insufficient prospects of success to warrant grant of leave to appeal except with respect to one aspect of one ground – where there would not be any significant saving in time or expense if an appeal on that ground were upheld – application dismissed
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1386
For more information, see the original judgement.
