PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for continuation of freezing orders – orders consented to by first respondent – second and third respondents served but did not appear – applicants have good arguable case – case concerns alleged theft of funds by first respondent and receipt of those funds by all respondents – risk of dissipation of assets established – appropriate to continue freezing orders until trial or earlier order
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0874
For more information, see the original judgement.
