PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – plaintiff and first defendant co-directors of three companies – plaintiff alleging breach of directors’ duties and oppression contrary to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – contravening conduct said to include the unilateral change to signatory authorisation on the companies’ bank accounts and denial of access to a server – sufficient question to be tried in relation to the facts alleged – whether the alleged conduct presents an urgent threat to the interests of the plaintiff in any capacity in which he may sue – relief not shown to be urgent – damages a sufficient remedy – application refused
Related cases about shareholder oppression
-
One Tree Agriculture Pty Ltd v Lye [2025] FCA 126
CORPORATIONS – directors – appointment and resignation – application to fix date of resignation – delay in filing notice of resignation – whether applicant established date on which they stopped being a director – whether just and equitable to fix date of resignation after ASIC register had been relied on by third party –…
-
Vitnell v Vellenga, in the matter of Australian Carers Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1492
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – plaintiff and first defendant co-directors of three companies – plaintiff alleging breach of directors’ duties and oppression contrary to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – contravening conduct said to include the unilateral change to signatory authorisation on the companies’ bank accounts and denial of access to…
-
Patel v Agrawal, in the matter of Sankul Investments Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 997
CORPORATIONS – alleged threatened oppressive conduct – whether interlocutory relief should be granted to refrain the holding of a general meeting to remove a director where the director has no entitlement to be appointed – whether serious question raised for the granting of interlocutory relief – whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1492
For more information, see the original judgement.
