copyright law

Who owns your Tweets?

HomeBlogIP litigation and disputesBreach of confidenceWho owns your Tweets?

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

If a Lawyer is asked the simple question “who owns an employee’s Tweets”? the likely answer will be “that depends”.  Like most legal issues, the question of “who owns your Tweets”? – if they are produced on work time, is not simply answered.  Each case will turn on its own facts, therefore what may be an easy answer in some instances may be more complicated in others.

What is a Tweet?

A “Tweet” is defined by Wikipedia as: “a text-based posts of up to 140 characters displayed on the author’s profile page and delivered to the author’s subscribers who are known as followers”.

Are Tweets “Literary Works” and therefore subject to copyright protection?

Section 10 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) defines literary work to include a table or compilation expressed in words. To be subject to copyright, a Tweet must be in written form, and must be an original literary work.

The case of State of Victoria v Pacific Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd (ACN 065 199 439) NSD 1429 of 2008 (Pacific), dealt with a claim seeking copyright protection over the phrase: “Help-Help-Driver-in-Danger-Call-Police-Ph.000”.  In this instance, the Court held that these words were not an original literary work and were therefore classed as ‘no more than a simple instruction’.

Tweets are limited to 140 characters and are generally short sentences and according Emmett J in Pacific at 20

“Short phrases, single sentences and the like are too insubstantial or too short to qualify as a literary work for the purposes of the Copyright Act”.

Therefore, it is unlikely that there is any copyright in a Tweet and they would not be automatically owned by the Employer if not created during work time.

The general rule

The general rule is that employers own the work of employees produced during working hours provided that the work is within the scope of what the employee was engaged to do.  This is subject to various qualifications including whether:

  • the employee used the employer’s resources;
  • the employee performs the work only during work hours; and
  • the individual was engaged as an employee and not an individual contractor.

Do employers own the Tweets produced during work time?

Provided that the Tweets were produced within the scope of an Employee’s contract and not partly after hours then the Tweets would prima facie belong to the Employer.  However, if the creation of the Tweets is not incidental to the contract of employment, then it’s likely that they are owned by the employee, who has created them.

Can an employer compel an employee to hand access to their Twitter account?

Assuming that the work was performed in the course of their employment, then there is no reason why an employee cannot be compelled to hand over the passwords to web based service that was created in the course of their employment.

Employers who are wanting to build up their reputation, should ensure that they have the right to compel hand over access to their social networking accounts by inserting binding contract clauses into their contracts of employment.

Further information

For further information on how Dundas Lawyers can assist your company to protect its rights when participating in Social Media, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

Doyles Recommended TMT Lawyer 2024

Related insights about copyright and employees

  • Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Justice Burley of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901 ordered that Telstra, within fourteen (14) days, provide to Siemens all documents in its control relating to the identity of certain Telstra Account holders.  Those account holders were suspected by Siemens of…

    Read more …

  • Use of the © (copyright) symbol

    Use of the © (copyright) symbol

    It is something that is often overlooked, however it is considered best practice to add a copyright statement and the little © symbol (Copyright Statement) on any literary or artistic works (Works) that a business publishes and asserts that it owns.  Under Australian law, the “material form” of all original Works is automatically protected by…

    Read more …

  • “User principle” damages for breach of copyright

    “User principle” damages for breach of copyright

    The usual position in intellectual property infringement matters is that the successful applicant can elect between an account of profits or damages.  However, what if the applicant has not suffered any direct loss as a result of the actions of the respondent that is held to have infringed its copyright?

    Read more …

  • Ed Sheeran wins “Shape of You” copyright infringement lawsuit

    Ed Sheeran wins “Shape of You” copyright infringement lawsuit

    This article examines the legal test for copyright infringement in Australia, using Ed Sheeran’s Court case in the UK as an example. Find out how the Courts determine when a song is a copy of another and what the implications are for musicians.

    Read more …

  • Hermès sues artist over NFTs of Birkin bags

    Hermès sues artist over NFTs of Birkin bags

    Explore the implications of virtual artworks created with the help of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and how this has caused a legal battle between a renowned fashion house and an American artist. Learn more about the copyright and trade mark infringement issues, and the implications of this case for the future of digital art.

    Read more …

  • Do I have an implied software license?

    Do I have an implied software license?

    This article examines the implications of a Federal Court case, which awarded over $1.1 million in damages for unlicensed software use. Learn more about the decision and key principles for software licencing that businesses should consider.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend