PATENTS – application for an interlocutory injunction by patent holder – where generic recently launched – where patent holder is claiming for infringement – where patent alleged to be invalid – whether balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction – where there has been substantial delay on the part of the patent holder – where detriment to the patent holder if the injunction is not granted is much more readily quantifiable in damages than the detriment to the generic – application dismissed
Related cases
-
AstraZeneca AB v Pharmacor Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 88
PATENTS – patent entitled “C-aryl glucoside SGLT2 inhibitors and method” which relates to the chemical compound ‘dapagliflozin’– consideration of principles relating to selection patents and whether they form part of Australian law PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patents – interlocutory injunction application to restrain launch of generic products prior to expiry of term of patent –…
-
UON Pty Ltd v Hoascar (No 2) [2025] FCA 1608
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – confidentiality – interlocutory application to strike out parts of statement of claim – confidential information disclosed during employment for developing and testing system – contractual obligations of confidence – equitable obligations of confidence – confidentiality claims in statement of claim said to be untenable due to finding in related proceeding that patent…
-
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV v Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1538
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patents – interlocutory injunction application – prime facie case – infringement – validity of patent – inventive step – false suggestion – balance of convenience – application granted PATENTS – paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable – infringement – regimen claim – method of treatment claim – Swiss claim – authorisation or participation…
