At Dundas Lawyers®, we understand that defending or enforcing of your business’s rights in confidential information can be critical for business success. Infringement and intellectual property theft is on the rise in the modern digital landscape. For many businesses, intellectual property protection involves more than just an idea or a concept, it is essential to protect genuine business assets. Dundas Lawyers® has experience identifying, enforcing and defending intellectual property rights and has acted for businesses inside and outside of the courtroom.
Do you need a confidential information lawyer?
Confidential information (Confidential Information) is a broad term that covers information, that is disclosed to another party in business dealings, that is generally not available to the public. There is no defined category or definition of Confidential Information, rather a variety of criteria must be considered to determine if information should be deemed confidential. This criterion includes but is not limited to the:
- information having a quality of confidence about it;
- information having a commercial value that imparts an obligation of confidence;
- unauthorised use of the information creating a detriment to the party disclosing it; and
- information being not obvious, trivial, or would be reasonably apparent to someone skilled in a particular field.
Confidential Information is valuable while it is kept secret, as such intrinsically over time protections have been developed through the English and Australian common law system to ensure that Confidential Information given as a Quasi-right is not misappropriated by the receiving party.
What legal avenues does a business have when confidential information is disclosed?
Through the renditions of English common Law, the Australia court system has recognised two causes of action for unauthorised disclosure of confidential information.
Breach of contract
If the two (2) parties are bound by a contract that contains an express or implied term of confidentiality, the disclosure of such information allows the disclosing party to bring an action for material breach of contract.
Equitable breach of confidential information (Breach of Confidence)
If it can be established that there is an obligation of confidence between two parties because of an agreement, fiduciary relationship or employment and there has been an unauthorised disclosure a cause of action for Breach of Confidence can be brought against the receiving party.
The two tests to determine if an obligation of confidence has arisen are:
- the Reasonable Person Test; and
- the Limited Purpose Test.
How businesses protect confidential information
- Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA);
- confidentiality policy;
- limit disclosure;
- action plan; or
- limit disclosure.
Remedies for unlawful use of confidential information
- Injunction;
- damages;
- account of profits;
- public orders; or
- compensation.
Industry expertise
Our confidential information protection and enforcement expertise is particularly relevant to the following industry sectors:
- artificial Intelligence;
- quality assured businesses;
- corporates undergoing digital transformation;
- game developers;
- health and life science;
- IT service providers;
- SaaS providers;
- software developers;
- patented and branded product manufacturers;
- professional services; and
- web and mobile app developers.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers® as your confidential information lawyer?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team that you want on your side to protect your businesses confidential information. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering engaging a confidential information lawyer?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in confidential information protection please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.

Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au

Complete the form below and we will respond to your inquiry within one (1) business day from the moment you press Submit.
Confidential information enquiry
Recent insights about confidential information
-
Misuse of confidential information in source code
In Australia, computer code can amount to confidential information as well as being subject to copyright protection. In some cases the two things overlap as was the case in decision of the Court in Optus Networks Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2010) 265 ALR 281; [2010] FCAFC 21.
-
Ex-employees and IP protection
Ex-employees can be a threat to a company’s intellectual property, but with the right contractual clauses, employers can protect their trademarks, copyright, patent, and design. Learn more about how to safeguard your company’s intellectual property.
-
Use of confidential information – the springboard injunction
This article examines the UK decision of Forse & ors v Secarma Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 215, which discussed the legal concept of a springboard injunction, and its implications in Australia. The Court must consider similar principles to determine if an injunction should be granted.
-
Injunction for breach of confidence
Dundas Lawyers helped a corporate client protect their confidential information and copyright material from a former employee and contractor. Read the full article to learn how they used detailed work and a chronology to secure justice for their client.
-
Are fiduciary duties owed by former directors?
A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.
-
What is the springboard doctrine?
This article examines the ‘springboard’ doctrine which refers to the benefit that is derived because of misuse of confidential information by a defendant that enables them to ‘springboard’ a new product or service to market more rapidly than if they had used their own mind.
-
Know-how versus confidential information
Understand the difference between “know-how” and confidential information when it comes to employer-employee relationships. Find out how to protect confidential trade secrets and use broad contractual terms to ensure protection. Click through to get the full details.
-
Compilations from the public domain – confidential or not?
The Court of Appeal in Ezystay Systems Pty Ltd v Link 2 Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 180 had to re-examine the test for confidential information. It found that for information to be protected, it must have the necessary attributes of confidentiality and must be the product of skill and ingenuity of the human brain.
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding confidential information
-
Aristocrat Technologies Australia PL v Light & Wonder, Inc. (No 2) [2025] FCA 64
Application for interlocutory injunction to restrain individual from using devices containing confidential information – application refused.
-
The Pops Group Pty Ltd as trustee for The Pool Shops Trust v Pro Pool Services Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 136
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – action for relief in respect of copyright infringement – judgment requires evaluative assessment of elements of respective marks – matter not suitable for summary judgment – application dismissed Related Federal Court cases Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0136For more information, see the original judgement.
-
Fortrend Securities Pty Ltd v Wollermann (No 2) [2025] FCA 96
CORPORATIONS – alleged breaches of equitable duty of confidence, fiduciary duties and statutory obligations by former employee – where clients moved from applicants to the respondents’ new employer – whether respondents breached the employment contract or used confidential information to solicit former clients – whether new employer liable as an accessory or for inducing breach…