copyright dispute lawyer

Copyright lawyer

Defending or enforcing your businesses rights in copyright can be critical to ensure that it is protected for its ongoing business success.  This is particularly important for businesses that are involved in licencing or producing copyright works as part of their business model. Dundas Lawyers® has experience identifying, enforcing and defending copyright infringement proceedings in both the Federal Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of Queensland.  Our skills in forensic investigations and case preparation are particularly relevant in copyright infringement matters.

Does your business need a copyright lawyer?

What has to be proven to establish a breach of copyright?

A summary of the elements to be satisfied to establish a breach of copyright will of course depend on the class of copyright works (Works) that are alleged to have been infringed that may include literary works, computer code, compilations of data and artistic works for example.  Generally, however for an applicant or plaintiff to be successful it must:

  • particularise in some detail the specific Works and their precise format that are alleged to have been infringed by the respondent(s);
  • establish ownership and originality of the Works in question by stating who the original author is and their relationship with the applicant;
  • state how the Works were first published in Australia;
  • state how the works in question have been reproduced within the meaning of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth);
  • state how the reproduction of the Works amounts to a “substantial reproduction”;
  • particularise how the applicant(s) has or will suffer loss and damage because of the infringement; and
  • include any additional circumstances that give rise to additional damages for flagrancy because of the acts of the respondent(s).

Of course, the above is a summary only of the things that must be proven to establish a breach of copyright.  Each case turns on its own facts.

Copyright infringement services by our lawyers

Dundas Lawyers® are experts in initiating and defending breach of copyright disputes involving various classes of works (including but not limited to):

  • Literary Works;
  • Compilations of Data;
  • Computer code
  • Artistic Works; and
  • Moral Rights.

Court decisions involving breach of copyright by Dundas Lawyers®

Dundas Lawyers® have expertise in both initiating and defending proceedings regarding all type of intellectual property.  Our list of Court decisions involving copyright infringement since 2014 includes:

Recent videos on copyright infringement by Dundas Lawyers®

Disclaimer
This page contains general commentary only about copyright infringement.  You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice.  Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.


Why choose Dundas Lawyers® to advise on copyright law?

Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010, we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your business to complete legal forensic investigations and case preparation.  Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:

  • our Uncommon business acumen;
  • our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
  • our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
  • our Uncommon customer focus;
  • the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
  • how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client solutions.

Need a copyright lawyer to advise your business?

For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in initiating or defending allegations of copyright infringement in an Australian Court please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.

Complete the form below and we will respond to your inquiry within one (1) business day from the moment you press Submit.

Copyright infringement enquiry

Your name(Required)
Please add your first name and last name
What type of work is the copyright material?

Recent insights about copyright infringement

  • Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Software developer obtains Court order – names behind IP addresses

    Justice Burley of the Federal Court of Australia in the case of Siemens Industry Software Inc v Telstra Corporation Limited [2020] FCA 901 ordered that Telstra, within fourteen (14) days, provide to Siemens all documents in its control relating to the identity of certain Telstra Account holders.  Those account holders were suspected by Siemens of…

  • “User principle” damages for breach of copyright

    “User principle” damages for breach of copyright

    The usual position in intellectual property infringement matters is that the successful applicant can elect between an account of profits or damages.  However, what if the applicant has not suffered any direct loss as a result of the actions of the respondent that is held to have infringed its copyright?

  • Ed Sheeran wins “Shape of You” copyright infringement lawsuit

    Ed Sheeran wins “Shape of You” copyright infringement lawsuit

    This article examines the legal test for copyright infringement in Australia, using Ed Sheeran’s Court case in the UK as an example. Find out how the Courts determine when a song is a copy of another and what the implications are for musicians.

  • Hermès sues artist over NFTs of Birkin bags

    Hermès sues artist over NFTs of Birkin bags

    Explore the implications of virtual artworks created with the help of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and how this has caused a legal battle between a renowned fashion house and an American artist. Learn more about the copyright and trade mark infringement issues, and the implications of this case for the future of digital art.

  • Do I have an implied software license?

    Do I have an implied software license?

    This article examines the implications of a Federal Court case, which awarded over $1.1 million in damages for unlicensed software use. Learn more about the decision and key principles for software licencing that businesses should consider.

  • Non-fungible tokens – the new way to own IP?

    Non-fungible tokens – the new way to own IP?

    Discover the rising phenomenon of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and how they can help protect your Intellectual Property (IP). Learn how NFTs works, its benefits for rights holders, and potential legal issues. Get the full picture here.

  • What are moral rights?

    What are moral rights?

    This article provides an overview of moral rights in Australia, including the three moral rights available to authors and performers, the works protected by them, their retrospective application, when they may be infringed, and the case of Meskenas v ACP Publishing Pty Ltd [2006] FMCA 1136 (Meskenas). Helping readers understand the implications of moral rights…

  • How much copying results in copyright infringement?

    How much copying results in copyright infringement?

    This article outlines the definition of Literary Works, the subsistence of copyright in such works, and the test for infringement of copyright under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). It also provides an overview of the four major characteristics to consider when determining if copying is substantial.

Recent Federal Court decisions about copyright law

  • Australian News Channel PL v Isentia PL [2025] FCAFC 49

    COPYRIGHT – statutory construction – section 183(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) – meaning of “for the services of the Commonwealth or State” – whether provision of media monitoring services to government clients within s 183(1) – appeal dismissed Related cases – Copyright infringement Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2025/2025fcafc0049For more information, see the original…

  • The Pops Group Pty Ltd as trustee for The Pool Shops Trust v Pro Pool Services Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 136

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – summary judgment – action for relief in respect of copyright infringement – judgment requires evaluative assessment of elements of respective marks – matter not suitable for summary judgment – application dismissed Related Federal Court cases Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0136For more information, see the original judgement.

  • Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc v Anderson (No 2) [2024] FCA 1459

      COPYRIGHT – circumvention devices – application by copyright owner under ss 116AN and 116AO of Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (“the Act”) – interpretation of relevant definitions in s 10(1) of the Act – “technological protection measure” – “access control technological protection measure” – “controls access” – whether device, product technology or component requires application…

Send this to a friend