Family businesses

  • Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    Can a unit trust be wound up by the oppression remedies

    The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corps Act) grants the Courts the power to award remedies under section 233, specifically designed to address situations of oppression within corporate entities under section 232.  These remedies, also known as the “Oppression Remedies”, aim to resolve situations where a company’s conduct unfairly prejudices its members or shareholders.  While primarily…

  • What exactly are retained earnings?

    What exactly are retained earnings?

    Retained Earnings are a financial metric that offers a valuable insight into a company’s financial health, extended stability and potential for future growth.  They represent the profit a company has retained overtime after accounting for all liabilities including the payment (if any) of dividends.

  • High Court on asset protection – house in spouse’s name

    High Court on asset protection – house in spouse’s name

    The decision of the High Court of Australia in Bosanac v Commissioner of Taxation [2022] HCA 34 (Bosanac) reaffirms the viability of protecting real property assets by registering them in the name of a spouse.

  • Is it possible to obtain oppression orders during company liquidation?

    Is it possible to obtain oppression orders during company liquidation?

    Despite liquidation, minority shareholders may still have remedies if they were treated unfairly. Learn more in our article, “Shareholder Oppression and Liquidation: Are Remedies Still Available?”

  • Do beneficiaries have access to the trust deed?

    Do beneficiaries have access to the trust deed?

    This article explores a beneficiary’s right to access a Trust Deed, including the Trusts Documents Rule, what Trust Documents a beneficiary is not entitled to, their rights under the Trusts Act 1973 (Qld) and Queensland’s affirmation of the common law principles.

  • Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    Shadow directors and de facto directors explained

    This article examines the legal reality of de facto directors and shadow directors, which go beyond those validly appointed. It also considers whether advisory board members can be classed as such, and the implications of this status, with reference to relevant case law.

  • Intellectual property theft and employee information theft

    Intellectual property theft and employee information theft

    Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd v Koudstaal (No 3) [2014] FCA 1129 (Leica Geosystems) is a notable court case involving an Anton Piller order and employee theft. Find out more about what this means for companies and their intellectual property rights.

Make an enquiry

Send this to a friend