-
![Note on: Nagpal v Global Cars Aus Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1300](https://www.dundaslawyers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/domain-name-disputes-scaled-1.jpg)
Note on: Nagpal v Global Cars Aus Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1300
The Federal Court has determined costs in the proceedings of Nagpal v Global Cars Au Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1300, awarding them to the respondent on an indemnity basis and fixing them by way of a lump sum.
-

Federal Court – issuing subpoenas internationally
This article provides an overview of the rules and considerations to take into account when seeking to issue a subpoena to an overseas party in the Federal Court of Australia. It covers the need to take extra care when issuing a subpoena and the process for service of a subpoena internationally.
-

Security for costs in Federal Court
A Court may order a party to pay security for potential legal costs to their opponent. This article examines the law and considerations of the Federal Court in applications for security for costs.
-

Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 update
The Therapeutic Goods Administration has released the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth), introducing changes to distinguish between physical and online therapeutic goods, updates to medical device and medicine advertising, and more. Get the details to stay informed and ensure compliance with the new rules.
-

Ex-employees and intellectual property protection
Ex-employees can be a threat to a company’s intellectual property, but with the right contractual clauses, employers can protect their trademarks, copyright, patent, and design. Learn more about how to safeguard your company’s intellectual property.
-

Novak Djokovic v Minister for Home Affairs – key facts
Novak Djokovic’s visa was cancelled by the Australian government, but a Court overturned the decision and released him from detention. Find out what happened and why in this article.
-

7-Eleven customer survey: implied consent?
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner found 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd are in breach of the Australian Privacy Principles (APP’s). Learn more about the findings, implications, and how businesses can comply with the APP’s.
-

Use of confidential information – the springboard injunction
This article examines the UK decision of Forse & ors v Secarma Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 215, which discussed the legal concept of a springboard injunction, and its implications in Australia. The Court must consider similar principles to determine if an injunction should be granted.






