Lawyers for litigation

ASIC v Wallet Ventures PL [2025] FCAFC 93

ASIC v Wallet Ventures PL [2025] FCAFC 93

CORPORATIONS – meaning of debenture in s 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where respondent operated a digital currency exchange through which customers could buy and sell certain cryptocurrencies – where respondent also offered a Finder application (Finder App) on mobile device platforms through which its customers could, amongst other things, access the “Finder Earn” product – where by investing in the Finder Earn product customers could exchange funds in their account to obtain “TrueAUD” stablecoins ownership of which was transferred to the respondent enabling the customer to earn a “return” quantified in TrueAUD which upon expiry of the term was credited to the customer’s Finder Wallet account in AUD – where primary judge held the respondent’s “Finder Earn” product was not a debenture on the basis that there was no money “deposited with or lent to” the respondent or in the alternative that there was no undertaking by the company to repay as a debt that money


Related cases about corporate law

  • DC Rd DC Pty Ltd v Zhang (Trial Judgment) [2026] FCA 16

    EQUITY – application for equitable relief and personal remedies for breaches of fiduciary duties – where applicant relied on respondents (property developers and an accountant) identifying and proposing properties to be purchased on applicants’ behalf – where respondents informed applicants that property would be purchased in applicant-company’s name for $45m – where respondents fashioned a…

  • First Class Securities Limited v Global Future Holdings Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 1

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex parte application for freezing orders under r 7.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – consideration of applicable principles – consideration of suspicious, irregular and unusual explanations for the non-repayment of an acknowledged debt of USD $7.5 million – orders made

  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v R M Capital Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 1634

    CORPORATIONS – financial services regulation – second defendant authorised representative of financial services licensee – agreement reached between regulator and second defendant as to liability – authorised representative found to have accepted conflicted remuneration in breach of s 963G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) CORPORATIONS – civil penalty – first defendant found to have…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/full/2025/2025fcafc0093For more information, see the original judgement.

Posted

in

, ,
Send this to a friend