Lawyers for litigation

Bing! Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 4) [2024] FCA 607

Bing! Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 4) [2024] FCA 607

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to set aside order under r 39.05(f) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 – Where order entered in favour of the applicant – Where the applicant is no longer trading – Where the trademark is no longer registered – Where no benefit derived from the order – Where all parties consent to the orders proposed – Order set aside.


Related trade mark cases

  • Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 598

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) and/or (d) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondents have failed to comply with court orders and failed to appear – allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – where marks were used by…

  • Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2024] FCAFC 65

    TRADE MARKS – non-use – Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 92(4)(b) – whether primary judge erred in finding that registered trade mark owner had not established use during relevant period – use in relation to particular goods and services alleged to have occurred by display of mark on website – use partially established for…

  • Redbubble Ltd v Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited (Costs) [2024] FCA 505

    COSTS – variation to relief granted by primary judge for infringement of trade marks – two appeals from separate decisions in proceeding below – where appellant obtained orders setting aside declarations and orders of primary judge in infringement proceedings below – whether appellant’s settlement offers entitle it to indemnity costs of proceedings below – whether…

Send this to a friend