Lawyers for litigation

Energy Beverages LLC v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 44

Energy Beverages LLC v Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 44

TRADE MARKS – application for leave to appeal from judgment of a single judge of the Court pursuant to s 195(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – where primary judge dismissed an appeal from the decision of a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in opposition proceedings – where delegate granted respondent’s application under s 92(4)(b) of the Act to remove the applicant’s registered trade mark MOTHERLAND from the Register for non-use – whether primary judge erred in finding applicant had not used MOTHERLAND as a trade mark – whether primary judge erred in finding applicant had not used MOTHERLAND as a trade mark during the relevant non-use period – no error established – application for leave to appeal dismissed

TRADE MARKS – application for leave to appeal from judgment of a single judge of the Court pursuant to s 195(2) of the Act – where primary judge dismissed an appeal from the decision of a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in opposition proceedings – where delegate found that applicant had not established grounds of opposition under ss 44, 60 and 42(b) of the Act to the respondent’s application to register MOTHERSKY – whether primary judge erred in failing to find that “coffee” and “non-alcoholic beverages” are similar goods within the meaning of s 44(1) of the Act – whether primary judge erred in finding that MOTHERSKY is not deceptively similar to MOTHER within the meaning of s 44(1) – whether primary judge erred in failing to find that use of MOTHERSKY in respect of “coffee” would be likely to deceive or cause confusion due to the reputation of MOTHER – error established – application for leave to appeal granted – appeal allowed


Related cases – trademarks

  • Container Rotation Systems Pty Ltd v Intermodal Solutions (Group) Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 161

    TRADE MARKS – infringement – container rotation systems – containerised bulk handling field – word mark – “rotainer” – whether “rotainer” is purely descriptive – genericism – where the infringer attempted to genericise the registered trade mark – where purported generic and descriptive meaning of the word mark is uncertain – evolution theory of changes…

  • Prezzee Pty Ltd v Epay Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1662

    TRADE MARKS – applicant the registered owner of trade marks comprising or including the word “Prezzee” – applicant using the word “Prezzee” on and in relation to electronic gift cards – respondent incorporating the word “Prezzy” on physical and electronic gift cards – applicant seeking interlocutory relief pending judgment on an action alleging trade mark…

  • NCL Corporation Ltd v Norwegian Brand Ltd [2025] FCA 1613

    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – trade marks – international registration designating Australia – objection to extension of international protection to Australia – whether trade mark applicant had intention to use mark in Australia – where trade mark applicant did not participate in appeal proceeding – no intention to use found PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – international service –…


Posted

in

Send this to a friend