PATENTS – innovation patent relating to hinges – infringement – validity – whether primary judge erred in the proper construction of the invention disclosed
PATENTS – validity – lack of clear and complete description – classical sufficiency – “relevant range” – s 40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in finding specifications did not enable skilled addressee to perform invention over the whole area claimed without undue burden
PATENTS – validity – lack of support – s 40(3) of the Act – comparison between invention specified in the claims and that described in the specification – technical contribution to the art
Related cases about Patents
-
Vehicle Monitoring Systems PL v SARB Management Group PL (No 13) [2025] FCA 1078
PATENTS – infringement – Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 122(1) – election between damages and account of profits – time of election – whether applicant should be compelled to make election before evidence is filed – balance between informed choice and efficient conduct of case – applicant ordered to make election within 21 days.
-
EIS Gmbh v LELO Oceania Pty Ltd (Liability Trial) [2025] FCA 1111
PATENTS – validity – infringement – standard patent entitled “Pressure Wave Massager” – compression wave massage device for sexual stimulation of the clitoris – construction – meaning of claim which refers to device “when used” in a specified way – whether device must be tested when used in that way – whether results of testing…
-
Scidera, Inc. v Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 1236
PATENTS – method claims – method claims that do not result in a product – patent area – infringement – infringement where method claims are partially performed offshore – exploit – exclusive rights given by patent – object of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for summary dismissal – novel…
