PATENTS – innovation patent relating to hinges – infringement – validity – whether primary judge erred in the proper construction of the invention disclosed
PATENTS – validity – lack of clear and complete description – classical sufficiency – “relevant range” – s 40(2)(a) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in finding specifications did not enable skilled addressee to perform invention over the whole area claimed without undue burden
PATENTS – validity – lack of support – s 40(3) of the Act – comparison between invention specified in the claims and that described in the specification – technical contribution to the art
Related cases about Patents
-
CPC Patent Technologies Pty Ltd v Apple Pty Limited [2025] FCA 489
PATENTS – patents for secure access systems – claim construction – infringement – validity PATENTS – construction of the asserted claims – construction of seven contested integers PATENTS – infringement – where the impugned devices incorporate biometric security systems utilising fingerprint and face recognition – factual contest regarding operation of the impugned devices – no…
-
Miele & Cie KG v Bruckbauer [2025] FCA 537
PATENTS – application to amend claims of a patent application under s 105 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) due to typographical error – correction of obvious mistake PATENTS – infringement – standard patent for a hob with a recess for a device for downwardly removing cooking vapours through suction – claim construction PATENTS –…
-
Novartis AG v Pharmacor Pty Limited [2025] FCAFC 33
PATENTS – infringement – standard patent for a pharmaceutical composition containing certain active pharmaceutical ingredients – claim construction – whether primary judge erred in construction of claim as not including a pharmaceutical composition where the active pharmaceutical ingredient is in the form of a complex in which the ions are associated by non-covalent bonds –…
