PRACTICE AND PROCCEDURE – release of security for costs – where applicant provided security for respondents’ costs – where applicant successful with substantial judgment – where applicant brings contempt application for alleged breach of freezing orders by first respondent – where any future costs order made in the first respondent’s favour in the contempt application could not possibly exceed judgment debt of $43 million – whether security should be released to the applicant
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0689
For more information, see the original judgement.
