PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to comply with Court orders and failed to appear – where second, third and fourth respondents have failed to file notice of address for service – where second, third and fourth respondents in default of appearance – applicant entitled to relief in relation to oppression and derivative claims for breaches of fiduciary duties and ss 180-183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – relief granted
Related cases on shareholder oppression
-
ASIC v Falcon Capital Ltd [2025] FCA 359
CORPORATIONS – winding up – application by ASIC for the winding up of a company on the just and equitable ground, together with a direction that the liquidator wind up a registered managed investment scheme and underlying unregistered funds – where the company accepted that the company and the funds should be wound down –…
-
London City Equities Ltd v Excelsior Capital Ltd [2025] FCA 285
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for winding up of the defendant on just and equitable grounds or on grounds of shareholder oppression – where plaintiff seeks leave to amend pleadings expanding the scope of factual matters in dispute – where proposed amendments include the joinder of additional parties and seek a variety of relief going…
-
One Tree Agriculture Pty Ltd v Lye [2025] FCA 126
CORPORATIONS – directors – appointment and resignation – application to fix date of resignation – delay in filing notice of resignation – whether applicant established date on which they stopped being a director – whether just and equitable to fix date of resignation after ASIC register had been relied on by third party –…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca0194
For more information, see the original judgement.
