TRADE MARKS – infringement of registered trade mark established – where registered trade mark is a name – joint tortfeasance – principles discussed
TRADE MARKS – specification of registered goods – meaning of “clothes” – role of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks as an aid to construction
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is a name mark – own name defence – whether joint tortfeasor who does not use the infringing mark can rely on the defence – whether defence applies to the use of an adopted name – where person relying on defence has assigned the name mark – whether assignor can rely on continuing use of own name as a defence
TRADE MARKS – defence to infringement – where infringing mark is deceptively similar to the registered mark – whether person using the infringing mark would obtain registration – honest concurrent use – whether concurrent use established – whether honest use established
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of reputation in prior mark, use of the registered mark would be likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
TRADE MARKS – cancellation – whether, because of circumstances applying at the time when the application for rectification is filed, the use of the registered mark is likely to deceive or cause confusion – where ground of cancellation is established – whether discretion should be exercised not to cancel the registration of the registered mark
Related Federal Court cases on trade marks
-
Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1463
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – ex parte application – strong prima facie case of trade mark and copyright infringement, and breach of s 18 and s 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – First Respondent’s two websites use the applicants’ logos and other branded content, and falsely indicate the First Respondent…
-
Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2023] FCA 1258
TRADE MARKS – infringement – whether the respondents have infringed the applicant’s registered trade marks comprising the word ORO TRADE MARKS – infringement – defences to infringement – whether the respondents can establish the defences under ss 122(1)(b)(i), 122(1)(e), 122(1)(f) and (fa), and 124 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) TRADE MARKS – validity…
