PRACTICE – leave sought pursuant to r 23.03(2)(a) to cross-examine Court expert – expert valued shares in a company which was the subject of oppression proceedings – proposed cross-examination to address valuation methodology – no point of principle
Related cases on Shareholder oppression
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v A One Multi Services Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 1209
CORPORATIONS – application for winding up under s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where all parties consent to the making of winding up order – winding up order made CORPORATIONS – issue concerning the identity of the liquidators to be appointed on the winding up – where the current receivers seek to…
-
Patel v Agrawal, in the matter of Sankul Investments Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 997
CORPORATIONS – alleged threatened oppressive conduct – whether interlocutory relief should be granted to refrain the holding of a general meeting to remove a director where the director has no entitlement to be appointed – whether serious question raised for the granting of interlocutory relief – whether the balance of convenience favours the grant of…
-
Lawrence v Melbourne Football Club Ltd [2024] FCA 945
CORPORATIONS – where member of Australian Rules football club brought proceeding seeking a declaration pursuant to s 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that certain conduct of the club was contrary to the interests of its members as a whole, and oppressive to members including himself and other “non-aligned” candidates seeking election to its…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0295
For more information, see the original judgement.
