INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for interlocutory injunction on grounds of contravention of ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)), passing off and infringement of a registered trade mark under s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of relevant factors – prima facie case – balance of convenience – interlocutory injunction not granted
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – consideration of relevant factors – prima facie case – balance of convenience
Related cases
-
ACCC v Clorox Australia Pty Limited [2025] FCA 357
CONSUMER LAW – alleged contraventions of ss 18, 29(1)(a), 29(1)(g) and 33 of the Australian Consumer Law – where representations made that kitchen tidy bags and garbage bags were made of 50% recycled plastic waste collected from the ocean or sea, when that was not the case – where parties jointly proposed agreed declarations of…
-
Jacksons Drawing Supplies PL v Jackson’s Art Supplies Ltd [2025] FCA 530
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for injunctive relief for breaches of s 18, s 29(1)(g) or s 29(1)(h) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 (ACL) and passing off – delay by applicant in seeking relief – discretionary refusal of wide injunctive relief CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – passing off –…
-
Inruse PL as trustee for the 224 Hinxman Trust v Equity Lenders PL [2024] FCA 1434
AUSTRALIAN CONSUMER LAW – where applicant alleged it entered into three loans because of misleading and deceptive conduct – alleged misleading and deceptive conduct in written material – whether the representation was conveyed by the whole of the conduct assessed in context – conduct not misleading and deceptive conduct – causation not established – associated…
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1443
For more information, see the original judgement.
