COPYRIGHT – interlocutory application – dispute over which of two persons is to be attributed and credited as the “principal director” of a documentary to be premiered this week at the Melbourne International Film Festival – moral rights – right of attribution of authorship – false attribution – misleading and deceptive conduct – interlocutory injunctive relief – serious question to be tried – balance of convenience – relief granted
Related cases about copyright infringement
-
Canview Pty Ltd v Gilmore [2024] FCA 551
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for interlocutory injunction – where the applicants contend that the respondent has misused confidential information and infringed copyright – where prima facie case established – whether balance of convenience favoured the grant of an injunction – where the form of interlocutory orders in contention – injunction granted
-
Australian News Channel Pty Ltd v Isentia Pty Limited [2024] FCA 363
COPYRIGHT – statutory construction – section 183(1) of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) – meaning of “for the services of the Commonwealth or State” – whether provision of media monitoring services to government clients within s 183(1) – application dismissed
-
Vald Pty Ltd v KangaTech Pty Ltd (No 5) [2024] FCA 333
PATENTS – patent for apparatus for use in assessing the strength of at least one knee flexor muscle of a subject – claim construction – patent for method of assessing strength of at least one knee flexor muscle using an apparatus – infringement – validity PATENTS – claim construction – whether results obtained from use…
