Lawyers for litigation

McCallum v Projector Films Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 903

McCallum v Projector Films Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 903

COPYRIGHT – interlocutory application – dispute over which of two persons is to be attributed and credited as the “principal director” of a documentary to be premiered this week at the Melbourne International Film Festival – moral rights – right of attribution of authorship – false attribution – misleading and deceptive conduct – interlocutory injunctive relief – serious question to be tried – balance of convenience – relief granted


Related cases about copyright infringement

  • Chan v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission [2023] FCA 1458

    ADMINSTRATIVE LAW – Employment Law – application for judicial review – interlocutory application for suspension of a decision to suspend APS employee from employment – serious question to be tried – balance of convenience – orders made

  • Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1463

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunction – ex parte application – strong prima facie case of trade mark and copyright infringement, and breach of s 18 and s 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – First Respondent’s two websites use the applicants’ logos and other branded content, and falsely indicate the First Respondent…

  • Native Extracts Pty Ltd v Plant Extracts Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 1265

    CONTRACT – restraint of trade – confidentiality clause – admissions made of breaches of contract during hearing of trial in relation to competing business – certain relief granted at conclusion of trial CONSUMER LAW – admitted breaches of Australian Consumer Law – injunctions and corrective advertising ordered before final judgment in interests of consumers COPYRIGHT…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca0903For more information, see the original judgement.
Send this to a friend