PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for urgent interlocutory relief – where urgent injunctive relief sought to maintain applicants’ access to respondents’ premises, and enforcement of purported oral undertakings given by the respondents – whether there is a prima facie case for relief – alleged breach of joint venture agreement or licence to occupy – whether previous application for urgent interlocutory relief on similar grounds was wrongly decided – whether balance of convenience favours injunctive relief – where previous second application for urgent interlocutory relief was refused by duty judge – application for interlocutory relief dismissed again
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca0500
For more information, see the original judgement.
