CONTRACTS – alleged oral contracts between franchisee and franchisor – whether applicants’ evidence concerning disputed conversations should be accepted – application dismissed
EVIDENCE – where all witnesses who gave evidence of conversations did so in indirect speech, except on the rare occasions where the witness gave evidence of a verbatim recollection of the words actually used – reasoning of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Wild v Meduri considered
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1265
For more information, see the original judgement.
