Lawyers for litigation

QGold Pty Ltd v Woods [2025] FCA 1201

QGold Pty Ltd v Woods [2025] FCA 1201

CORPORATIONS – application for compulsory acquisition of residual ordinary shares of Carawine Resources Limited – where the applicant is the “90% holder” of the relevant class of securities – where the applicant’s compliance with Division 1 of Part 6A.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) is irregular in part – whether appropriate to remediate such irregularities pursuant to s 1322 of the Act – where the applicant lodged a compulsory acquisition notice with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission on 21 March 2024 – where the notice relies upon the opinion expressed in an expert’s report dated 26 February 2024 – whether expert’s report inconsistent with the Act or otherwise deficient – whether applicant has established that the terms set out in the compulsory acquisition notice give a “fair value” for the relevant securities – application granted – costs reserved


Recent cases about acquisitions

  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v R M Capital Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 1634

    CORPORATIONS – financial services regulation – second defendant authorised representative of financial services licensee – agreement reached between regulator and second defendant as to liability – authorised representative found to have accepted conflicted remuneration in breach of s 963G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) CORPORATIONS – civil penalty – first defendant found to have…

  • QGold Pty Ltd v Woods [2025] FCA 1201

    CORPORATIONS – application for compulsory acquisition of residual ordinary shares of Carawine Resources Limited – where the applicant is the “90% holder” of the relevant class of securities – where the applicant’s compliance with Division 1 of Part 6A.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) is irregular in part – whether appropriate to…

  • HealthX Group Pty Ltd v Palling (No 2) [2025] FCA 1300

    INDUSTRIAL LAW – construction of term in employment contract providing for profit sharing arrangement between employer and employee – where employer seeks declaration that it is not liable to pay employee a “bonus” – where employee seeks damages for non-payment of “profit share” – characterisation of employee’s entitlement to payment WORDS AND PHRASES – construction…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca1201For more information, see the original judgement.

Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend