Lawyers for litigation

QGold Pty Ltd v Woods [2025] FCA 1201

QGold Pty Ltd v Woods [2025] FCA 1201

CORPORATIONS – application for compulsory acquisition of residual ordinary shares of Carawine Resources Limited – where the applicant is the “90% holder” of the relevant class of securities – where the applicant’s compliance with Division 1 of Part 6A.2 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) is irregular in part – whether appropriate to remediate such irregularities pursuant to s 1322 of the Act – where the applicant lodged a compulsory acquisition notice with the Australian Securities & Investments Commission on 21 March 2024 – where the notice relies upon the opinion expressed in an expert’s report dated 26 February 2024 – whether expert’s report inconsistent with the Act or otherwise deficient – whether applicant has established that the terms set out in the compulsory acquisition notice give a “fair value” for the relevant securities – application granted – costs reserved


Recent cases about acquisitions

  • Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited (Order to Recall Witnesses) [2024] FCA 572

    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where contravention of a civil remedy provision previously found – where applicant seeks statutory compensation under s 545(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – where new “logical counterfactual” argument raised by the respondent in closing submissions – overarching purpose of civil practice and procedure provisions considered – where in…

  • Gaha v Gaha [2024] FCA 531

    CORPORATIONS – application by litigation representative for approval of deed of compromise – whether litigation representative is an ‘independent’ lawyer for purposes of r 9.71(2)(c) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether compromise in best interest of applicant – confidentiality orders

  • Crowley v Worley Limited (Costs) [2024] FCA 211

    COSTS – whether costs should be apportioned – where applicant succeeded on several questions but failed to obtain compensation – where any victory was Pyrrhic – costs not apportioned COSTS – whether order should extend to costs of initial trial before remitter – where evidence from initial trial deployed on remitter – where initial trial…

Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca1201For more information, see the original judgement.

Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend