TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of Registrar of Trade Marks – whether trade mark should be removed from Trade Marks Register for non-use – whether onus of proof discharged in relation to non-use period –whether Court should exercise discretion under s 101 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) not to remove trade mark – public interest and risk of confusion – part of appeal allowed with consent of parties – appeal otherwise dismissed
Related cases about trademark infringement
-
Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 598
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) and/or (d) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondents have failed to comply with court orders and failed to appear – allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – where marks were used by…
-
Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2024] FCAFC 65
TRADE MARKS – non-use – Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 92(4)(b) – whether primary judge erred in finding that registered trade mark owner had not established use during relevant period – use in relation to particular goods and services alleged to have occurred by display of mark on website – use partially established for…
-
Redbubble Ltd v Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited (Costs) [2024] FCA 505
COSTS – variation to relief granted by primary judge for infringement of trade marks – two appeals from separate decisions in proceeding below – where appellant obtained orders setting aside declarations and orders of primary judge in infringement proceedings below – whether appellant’s settlement offers entitle it to indemnity costs of proceedings below – whether…
