TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of Registrar of Trade Marks – whether trade mark should be removed from Trade Marks Register for non-use – whether onus of proof discharged in relation to non-use period –whether Court should exercise discretion under s 101 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) not to remove trade mark – public interest and risk of confusion – part of appeal allowed with consent of parties – appeal otherwise dismissed
Related cases about trademark infringement
-
Redbubble Ltd v Hells Angels Motorcycle Corporation (Australia) Pty Limited [2024] FCAFC 15
CONTRACTS – construction – scope of releases in settlement agreement – prima facie canon of construction -whether releases apply to proceeding TRADE MARKS – infringement – trap viewing – extra-territorial application of s 120(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether images were available to consumers in the ordinary course of trade –…
-
Caporaso Pty Ltd v Mercato Centrale Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 138
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – trade marks – originating application alleging infringement of trade marks including the plain word mark mercato – whether the respondent has used, as a trade mark, a sign that is deceptively similar to any one of the applicant’s trade marks sued upon – cross-claim for cancellation of trade marks or rectification of…
-
The Agency Group Australia Ltd v H.A.S. Real Estate Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 203
TRADE MARKS – appeal – where primary judge found that the respondent had not infringed the second appellant’s registered trade marks – whether primary judge erred in finding that the word mark THE NORTH AGENCY used by the respondent was not deceptively similar to the second appellant’s registered trade mark – no error established –…
