PATENTS – jump starter device for jump starting a depleted or discharged battery (eg in a vehicle) – priority date – where the patents in suit claimed an earliest priority date based on the filing date of a PCT application – where the cross-claimant contended that the patents were not entitled to the asserted priority date – whether, for each asserted claim, the invention in the claim was disclosed in the PCT application PATENTS – jump starter device for jump starting a depleted or discharged battery (eg in a vehicle) – novelty and inventive step –whether the claims in the patents in suit were anticipated by one or other of two documents – whether the claims in the patents in suit would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art in light of the common general knowledge (CGK) alone, or in light of the CGK together with one or other of two documents PATENTS – jump starter device for jump starting a depleted or discharged battery (eg in a vehicle) – best method – where the cross-claimant contended that the patentee had not disclosed the best method known to the patentee for performing the invention – whether the knowledge element was to be determined as at the international filing date or as at the filing date for the patents in suit PATENTS – jump starter device for jump starting a depleted or discharged battery (eg in a vehicle) – infringement – whether the impugned products infringed the claims in the patents in suit – construction issues – whether the claims required that the device automatically start upon satisfaction of preconditions – whether a product that is capable of operating in manual mode falls outside the scope of the claims – whether references to “USB” in the claims encompass USB-C, which had not been released as at the asserted priority date
Related cases about patent infringement
-
AstraZeneca AB v Pharmacor Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 88
PATENTS – patent entitled “C-aryl glucoside SGLT2 inhibitors and method” which relates to the chemical compound ‘dapagliflozin’– consideration of principles relating to selection patents and whether they form part of Australian law PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patents – interlocutory injunction application to restrain launch of generic products prior to expiry of term of patent –…
-
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV v Juno Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 1538
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – patents – interlocutory injunction application – prime facie case – infringement – validity of patent – inventive step – false suggestion – balance of convenience – application granted PATENTS – paliperidone palmitate long-acting injectable – infringement – regimen claim – method of treatment claim – Swiss claim – authorisation or participation…
-
Vehicle Monitoring Systems PL v SARB Management Group PL (No 13) [2025] FCA 1078
PATENTS – infringement – Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 122(1) – election between damages and account of profits – time of election – whether applicant should be compelled to make election before evidence is filed – balance between informed choice and efficient conduct of case – applicant ordered to make election within 21 days.
