PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – service out of the jurisdiction – substituted service – where the respondents are registered in Hong Kong and China – where the applicant claims that the respondents are infringing its Australian patents by conduct in Australia and seeks injunctive relief – where the applicant contends that it is not practicable to serve the respondents utilising the Hague Convention – whether the Court has power to make an order for substituted service under the general rule for substituted service – held: order for substituted service made
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca0533
For more information, see the original judgement.
