TRADE MARKS – infringement claim pursuant to s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether the respondent used the plain word mark THE PRACTICE as a trade mark – whether the respondent’s marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the applicant’s mark – defence under s 122(1)(b)(i) of the Act – whether the respondent used its logo in good faith to indicate the kind, quality or intended purpose of the services it offers – defence under s 122(1)(f) or (fa) of the Act – whether the respondent would obtain registration of its logo under s 44(3)(a) or (b) of the Act — where respondent’s use of its logo was not in good faith or honest due to inadequate searches – defences not made out – claim allowed – declaratory and injunctive relief granted — damages of $200,000 awarded, including $100,000 in additional damages
Related trade mark cases
-
Deakin University v Macreadie [2026] FCA 481
CONSUMER LAW – application for permanent injunctions pursuant to s 232 of the Australian Consumer Law restraining the respondents from representing that the second respondent is the owner of the relevant intellectual property and trade marks of the Blue Carbon Lab – application for mandatory injunction requiring the second respondent to change its name –…
-
Black Star Pastry Pty Ltd v Richards (No 2) [2026] FCA 383
TRADE MARKS – whether one of two joint owners of a trade mark can apply for registration of the trade mark in own name under section 27 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – where section 28 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) permits registration of trade mark by joint owners – where section 20(5) Trade Marks…
-
Trafalgar Group Pty Ltd v Boss Fire & Safety Pty Ltd [2026] FCA 202
TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of Registrar – non-use – mark used in relevant period as part of composite marks – “mark within a mark” – appeal allowed TRADE MARKS – whether second word in each of composite marks used after trade mark were additions or alterations “substantially affecting its identity” – held that…
