TRADE MARKS – infringement claim pursuant to s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) (the Act) – whether the respondent used the plain word mark THE PRACTICE as a trade mark – whether the respondent’s marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the applicant’s mark – defence under s 122(1)(b)(i) of the Act – whether the respondent used its logo in good faith to indicate the kind, quality or intended purpose of the services it offers – defence under s 122(1)(f) or (fa) of the Act – whether the respondent would obtain registration of its logo under s 44(3)(a) or (b) of the Act — where respondent’s use of its logo was not in good faith or honest due to inadequate searches – defences not made out – claim allowed – declaratory and injunctive relief granted — damages of $200,000 awarded, including $100,000 in additional damages
Related trade mark cases
-
Firstmac Limited v Zip Co Limited [2023] FCA 540
TRADE MARKS – infringement claim pursuant to s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether the infringing marks are substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the applicant’s mark – defence under s 122(1)(f) and (fa) of the Act – whether respondents would obtain registration of the infringing marks if they were…
-
Seven Network (Operations) Limited v 7-Eleven Inc [2023] FCA 608
TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of delegate of Registrar of Trade Marks – whether trade mark should be removed from Trade Marks Register for non-use – whether onus of proof discharged in relation to non-use period –whether Court should exercise discretion under s 101 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) not to remove…
-
Energy Beverages LLC v Kangaroo Mother Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 999
TRADE MARKS – appeal from decision of the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks to refuse appellant’s opposition to application by respondent for registration of KANGAROO MOTHER trade mark – hearing de novo – s 59 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – where as at priority date respondent did not intend to…
