CONTRACTS – formation – where applicant and second respondent were parties to a Distributor Agreement – where closure of the second respondent announced – where applicant and first respondent executed a Branded Product Distribution Agreement – where applicant alleged that applicant and first respondent made an alternative agreement or that such agreement could be inferred from conduct – alternative agreement not established CONTRACTS – whether the Branded Product Distribution Agreement was entered into by reason of economic duress – economic duress not established CONTRACTS – interpretation – whether the Distributor Agreement was a perpetual agreement CONSUMER LAW – whether the respondents engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct or made misrepresentations – whether the respondents engaged in unconscionable conduct – whether the applicant is entitled to loss and damage – application dismissed
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2025/2025fca1124For more information, see the original judgement.
