PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — interlocutory application by first respondent seeking an extension of existing orders — where the first respondent was unsuccessful in defending patent infringement proceedings at the suit of the applicant and its cross-claim alleging patent invalidity was dismissed — whether a stay of orders made by the Court, including for injunctions and costs, should be extended until the hearing and determination of an appeal by the first respondent — where appeal genuine and based on reasonable grounds — consideration of possible loss if stay is not granted — whether non-publication orders made at the request of the first respondent should be extended
Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2023/2023fca1214
For more information, see the original judgement.
