At Dundas Lawyers®, we understand the needs of international companies and strive to unlock success with our clients operating within Australia and internationally. Being a Queensland based law firm, we are proxy to all that is good about the Australian market and recognise the international needs of overseas and local clients.
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your international company. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your international company gain an uncommon advantage, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Legislation
Recent insights for international companies
-
New Anti-Money Laundering Bill
On 11 September 2024 the (Bill) was introduced to the House of Representatives.[1] The Bill will amend the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (Cth) (AML/CTF Act) to include provisions regarding deterrence, detection and disruption of money laundering and terrorism financing.[2] Most changes will take effect from 31 March 2026.
-
Benefits of international arbitration
International commercial arbitration offers significant benefits to businesses engaged in international transactions. It enables them to resolve disputes quicker, at a lower cost, and with greater enforceability than can normally be achieved through national Courts.
-
Arbitration clauses in international contracts
Arbitration is a private process where parties to a commercial contract agree (Arbitration Agreement) to let an arbitrator[1] (Arbitrator) make a binding decision on a dispute between them, without recourse to national Courts. The Arbitrator receives evidence, hears arguments and applies relevant law to reach a binding decision, called an award (Award). The Arbitrator’s decision…
-
Shadow directors and de facto directors
This article examines the legal reality of de facto directors and shadow directors, which go beyond those validly appointed. It also considers whether advisory board members can be classed as such, and the implications of this status, with reference to relevant case law.
-
Groundless threats of trade mark infringement
Businesses must be aware of the legal considerations when making allegations of trade mark infringement. Learn more about the Pacific Ale Case and the two possible defences, Section 129(4) and (5) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), to protect your brand and avoid potential legal ramifications.
-
Intellectual property theft | Employee theft of information
Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd v Koudstaal (No 3) [2014] FCA 1129 (Leica Geosystems) is a notable court case involving an Anton Piller order and employee theft. Find out more about what this means for companies and their intellectual property rights.
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding international companies
-
Harman v Opus Recruitment Solutions – Australia Pty Ltd (Stay Application) [2024] FCA 1356
INDUSTRIAL LAW – application to declare restrictive covenants in an employment contract and shareholder agreement invalid – where each of the clauses are respectively the subject of exclusive jurisdiction clauses of New South Wales and England and Wales – applications for declarations that the employment ceased by reason of redundancy and also as to how…
-
KTC v David (Security for Costs) [2024] FCA 911
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further security for costs – where Applicant has no assets in Australia – where original security not yet exhausted – whether further security premature – consideration of appropriate quantum Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca0911For more information, see the original judgement.
