The following content is for private clients and high net worth individuals
Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?
Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for you as a private client or high net worth individual. Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:
- our Uncommon business acumen;
- our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
- our Uncommon expertise forensic case preparation;
- our Uncommon customer focus;
- the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
- how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.
Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?
For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Recent insights for private clients and high net worth individuals
Recent Federal Court decisions regarding private clients and high net worth individuals
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Hartley [2025] FCA 322
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – ex parte application for freezing orders and ancillary orders – whether there is a good arguable case for final relief on prospective cause of action for tax related liabilities – whether there is a degree of danger or risk that any judgment obtained will not be met due to dissipation of…
-
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Peever [2024] FCA 1470
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – urgent ex parteapplication for freezing orders under rr 7.32 and 7.35 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – good arguable case for final relief – danger of disposal or dissipation of assets – application granted Related cases Original article available at: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca1470For more information, see the original judgement.
-
Kocic v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCA 1386
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time and leave to appeal – where primary judge allowed amendments to statement of claim – whether primary judge erred by misapplying the proper approach to contemporary pleadings in circumstances alleging fraud – whether primary judge erred in finding that the statement of claim did not deploy…
