Therapeutic goods manufacturers

HomeIndustry expertiseTherapeutic goods manufacturers

Dundas lawyers advises on all aspects of the new Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth) (2021 TGA Code) that brought about several changes to the regulatory framework for advertising and manufacturing therapeutic goods.  This includes advise on compliance with The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) which is the regulatory body in Australia for medicines and products that are marketed as having a “therapeutic” effect.

Why choose Dundas Lawyers®?

Having exerted Blood Sweat and Years® since April 2010 we are the team you want on your side for the long term to act as the ‘bodyguard’ for your therapeutic goods business.  Some of the reasons clients choose Dundas Lawyers® include:

  • our Uncommon business acumen;
  • our Uncommon expertise in transactional, compliance and litigious matters;
  • our Uncommon expertise in advising manufacturers of therapeutic goods;
  • our Uncommon customer focus;
  • the fact that we don’t just know law, we know business!
  • how we leverage our Uncommon Nous® to provide client centric solutions.

Considering getting a lawyer to advise your business?

For a confidential, no obligation initial telephone call to find out how we can help your business gain an uncommon advantage in therapeutic good manufacturing, please phone our team on either 1300 386 529 or 07 3221 0013.

Recent insights for therapeutic goods manufacturers

  • Influencers now regulated when promoting therapeutic goods

    Influencers now regulated when promoting therapeutic goods

    The Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth) (2021 TGA Code) brings regulations for social media endorsements of therapeutic goods. Learn more about the changes and how to ensure compliance before they take effect on 1 January 2022. Read more

  • Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Use of a competitors trade marks for comparative advertising

    Comparative advertising can be a powerful tool, but it must be done within the bounds of the law. Learn more about the legal implications of comparative advertising in Australia, including the case of GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2018] FCA 1. Read more

  • Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 update

    Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 update

    The Therapeutic Goods Administration has released the Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 (Cth), introducing changes to distinguish between physical and online therapeutic goods, updates to medical device and medicine advertising, and more. Get the details to stay informed and ensure compliance with the new rules. Read more

Recent Federal Court decisions regarding therapeutic goods manufacturers

  • Novartis AG v Pharmacor PL [2025] FCAFC 33

    PATENTS – infringement – standard patent for a pharmaceutical composition containing certain active pharmaceutical ingredients – claim construction – whether primary judge erred in construction of claim as not including a pharmaceutical composition where the active pharmaceutical ingredient is in the form of a complex in which the ions are associated by non-covalent bonds –…

  • Sun Pharma ANZ Pty Ltd v Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd [2025] FCA 44

    PATENTS – patent for controlled release aripiprazole formulations and methods for preparing and using such formulations – validity of extension of term of patent – validity of claims – whether pharmaceutical substance per se – whether pharmaceutical substance can include formulations – whether formulations can only include substances which have therapeutic use – whether pharmaceutical…

  • Abbey Laboratories Pty Ltd v Virbac (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1488

    PATENTS – application for an interlocutory injunction by patent holder – where generic recently launched – where patent holder is claiming for infringement – where patent alleged to be invalid – whether balance of convenience favours the grant of an injunction – where there has been substantial delay on the part of the patent holder…

Send this to a friend