The consequences for an Australian business victim for a breach of cyber security are forecast to exponentially increase. In February 2015 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (Committee) recommended the introduction of mandatory data breach notification scheme (Scheme) by the end of 2015.[1] Whilst the details of the incoming Scheme are currently scant, it is understood that the enacting legislation will have bi-partisan support in federal parliament.
Mandatory data breach notifications requirements a la the Scheme are far from a recent development. They were first recommended by the Australian Law Reform Commission in 2008 and have been in place in the United States since 2003.
Lessons from the United States
Australian businesses have the benefit of approximately fifteen (15) years’ worth of practical guidance from the United States alone. In these fifteen (15) years it is estimated that 675 million data records have been reported as being compromised and 783 data breaches occurred last year alone.[2]
By and large the United States experience demonstrates the significant costs incidental to a data breach that may arise by virtue of mandatory notification schemes. Amongst these costs are the damages to reputation and public relations and the potential litigation commenced by notified parties.
Preparing for the change
Australian businesses should take heed of the United States experience and undertake a comprehensive review of their data breach policies. By ensuring that your policies for reacting to a data breach are airtight you can mitigate any damage that may arise from your obligations under the Scheme. The guidelines for dealing with data breaches released by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner in 2012 provide a solid foundation (outlined by Dundas Lawyers here) for preparing a policy but you should seek professional advice to develop a policy more tailored to your individual business.
Links and further references
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, A guide to securing personal information
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, A guide to data breach preparation and response
Further information about data security
If you would like further advice on your obligations concerning data breaches please contact us for a confidential and obligation free discussion.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
[1] Smith, P, Litigation, PR disasters and higher insurance costs expected from new data breach laws, (2015). Accessed at http://www.afr.com/technology/litigation-pr-disasters-and-higher-insurance-expected-from-new-data-breach-laws-20150805-gis75j accessed on 13 August 2015.
[2] Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, Advisory report on the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014, (2015) at p. 299.
Related insights about data security
-
International businesses subject to Australian privacy laws
Australian Intelligence Community (AIC) Commissioner Falk determined how the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) will assess if international entities have an Australian Link to Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
-
7-Eleven customer survey: implied consent?
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner found 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd are in breach of the Australian Privacy Principles (APP’s). Learn more about the findings, implications, and how businesses can comply with the APP’s.
-
Use of confidential information – the springboard injunction
This article examines the UK decision of Forse & ors v Secarma Ltd & ors [2019] EWCA Civ 215, which discussed the legal concept of a springboard injunction, and its implications in Australia. The Court must consider similar principles to determine if an injunction should be granted.
-
Swiss company hands over user data
A Court order in Switzerland raises questions about Australian law enforcement’s ability to access encrypted data. This article explores the legislative perspective on accessing private or business communications, and the steps taken to protect transmitted information.
-
Parliament passes Government surveillance bill
The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Bill 2021 added three (3) warrants, allowing law enforcement to access data and take control of online accounts to obtain evidence of serious online crime.
-
Data breach compliance and response plans
Dundas Lawyers create tailored data breach response plans to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Plans include actions, registers, records, tests and tasks. Get an obligation-free and confidential discussion to learn more.
