CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – where the respondent represented to consumers on its website, via email and on its social media accounts that they could purchase airfares for promoted prices – where the respondent represented to certain consumers that their airfare bookings were confirmed – where the respondent admitted that it contravened ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – where the parties jointly proposed declarations and pecuniary penalties
Related cases about internet law
-
Universal City Studios LLC v Telstra Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 1485
COPYRIGHT – application for orders disabling access to new means of access to certain target online locations (Additional Urgent Access Means) – where site blocking and ancillary orders previously made with respect to target online locations under s 115A of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) – where target online locations subsequently made available through different…
-
Universal City Studios LLC v Telstra Limited [2025] FCA 1390
COPYRIGHT – whether site blocking and ancillary orders with respect to 52 target online locations ought to be made under s 115A of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Act) – where the applicants rely on presumptions in s 126, s 131 and s 115A(5A) of the Act and on deemed admissions as to ownership of…
-
eSafety Commissioner v Rotondo (No 4) [2025] FCA 1191
COMMUNICATIONS LAW – Where the applicant seeks declarations that the respondent contravened the Online Safety Act 2021 – where the respondent admits to contravening the Online Safety Act 2021 – declaration made. COMMUNICATIONS LAW – Where the applicant seeks pecuniary penalty – where the respondent admits to contravening the Online Safety Act 2021 – where…
