CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – where the respondent represented to consumers on its website, via email and on its social media accounts that they could purchase airfares for promoted prices – where the respondent represented to certain consumers that their airfare bookings were confirmed – where the respondent admitted that it contravened ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – where the parties jointly proposed declarations and pecuniary penalties
Related cases about internet law
-
ACCC v Webjet Marketing PL [2025] FCA 867
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Webjet Marketing Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 867
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Wallet Ventures Pty Ltd [2025] FCAFC 93
CORPORATIONS – meaning of debenture in s 9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where respondent operated a digital currency exchange through which customers could buy and sell certain cryptocurrencies – where respondent also offered a Finder application (Finder App) on mobile device platforms through which its customers could, amongst other things, access the…
-
Maxim Media Inc. v Nuclear Enterprises Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 1443
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – application for interlocutory injunction on grounds of contravention of ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)), passing off and infringement of a registered trade mark under s 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – consideration of relevant factors…
