CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – where the respondent represented to consumers on its website, via email and on its social media accounts that they could purchase airfares for promoted prices – where the respondent represented to certain consumers that their airfare bookings were confirmed – where the respondent admitted that it contravened ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – where the parties jointly proposed declarations and pecuniary penalties
Related cases about internet law
-
Neville v Google LLC [2023] FCA 625
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for preliminary discovery pursuant to r 7.22 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – communications made to commercial partners and contractual counterparties – potential causes of action in defamation and injurious falsehood – application substantially granted
-
Cargill, Incorporated v Cargill Financial Services International Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 604
TRADE MARKS – infringement – Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 120 – use of name as a mark – use of deceptively similar mark – infringement established. TRADE MARKS – application for final relief – application for relief where respondents rogue agents – application to change name on ASIC register – application to change…
-
Vitaco Health IP Pty Ltd v AFI Cosmetic Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 598
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for default judgment pursuant to r 5.23(2)(c) and/or (d) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – where the respondents have failed to comply with court orders and failed to appear – allegations of trade mark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and passing off – where marks were used by…
