technology lawyer

Custom end user licence agreements for the iStore

HomePrivate: BlogTechnology lawSoftware development lawCustom end user licence agreements for the iStore

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

When Software Developers (Developers) or their clients launch a new application (App) in the iStore, the default terms and conditions are Apple’s standard End User Licence Agreement (EULA).  However, a number of situations arise where it may be in the best interests of the owner of the App to provide their own EULA in place of the default one.  

Why would you need to deviate from the standard EULA?

Apple’s EULA deals with most of the usual licensing issues, however it may not align perfectly with Australian law.  For example, regardless of the customer (End User) agreeing to the jurisdiction of the Courts of California and the law of the United States, various terms will apply including the statutory guarantees as provided in schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).  Further to this, because of the evolution of the case law in the area of unfair contract terms, it’s possible that some of the terms and conditions in the default EULA will become “unfair” and unenforceable by default.

Apple requirements for bespoke EULA’s

Prior to inclusion of the App in the iStore, Apple has provided a guide for Developers who intend to supply their own EULA with an App.  In short, the guide describes the minimum requirements which the bespoke EULA must meet:

  • the EULA should acknowledge that parties to the agreement are the Developer and the End User and not Apple;
  • the Developer is solely responsible for the App;
  • the EULA must not conflict (be less restrictive) that the terms and conditions of the iStore;
  • the scope fo the EULA is to be limited to a non-transferrable licence to use the App on the device which it is downloaded;
  • the Developer is solely responsible for support;
  • the parties must acknowledge that Apple is not responsible for supporting the App;
  • the Developer must be responsible for product warranties;
  • should the App fail, Apple will refund the purchase price of the App and thereafter Apple will have no further responsibility;
  • the EULA must not attempt to limit the Developers liability over and what is allowable under statute;
  • in the event of any claimed intellectual property infringement, the Developer must be responsible for investigating the defending the matter and not Apple;
  • the Developer must warrant that they are outside of the United States and in particular that they are not in a country which is “embargoed by the United States” or is deemed to be a “terrorist supporting country”;
  • the contact details of the Developer and customer service information in the event that the end user needs to contact the developer;
  • the EULA must provide that the Apple is a third party beneficiary to the EULA and agree that Apple and any of its subsidiaries may enforce the terms of against any end user.

In short, there is quite a few issues to consider when drafting bespoke EULA’s to comply with Apple’s requirements.  The complete guide is available  on the Apple website.

Ensuring that the terms and conditions are legally binding

The usual rules of bringing the EULA to the attention of end users apply in this instance.  The Developer must do all that is reasonably possible to bring the EULA to the attention of the end user.  See our article: “Are your website terms and conditions binding?”

Further information

If you would like to discuss having a lawyer draft a bespoke EULA that complies with the rules for the iStore, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:


Related insights about technology law

  • Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    The Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is silent, but the Court considers email trackers and read receipts as evidence in civil and intellectual property litigation. As seen in Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114, sender’s receipt of confirmation of email relay is a matter for the recipient.

    Read more …

  • Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    The ruling of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 has opened the door for artificial intelligence-created inventions to be eligible for patent protection. Learn more about the implications of this groundbreaking decision.

    Read more …

  • The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map provides clarity on ever-changing legal landscape, covering commercial enterprises, cyber offences, infrastructure, international law, national security and personal rights. A source for understanding laws and providing safety/security in the digital age.

    Read more …

  • Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) is quickly moving through Parliament and looks likely to become law. It requires digital platforms, such as Facebook and Google, to negotiate remuneration with News Companies for providing their media services. Non-compliance could result in hefty civil penalties.

    Read more …

  • My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    This article examines how professional service businesses can protect their investment in employees from clients poaching them. It looks at potential clauses such as client agreements, non-solicitation of employees, restraints of trade, confidential information, copyright and more.

    Read more …

  • Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    A decision by Australian Patent Office provides insight into patentable subject matter for computer-implemented inventions. Case of Facebook, Inc. [2020] APO 19 is a successful example of technical improvement in computer-implemented method, resulting in patentability even with generic computer implementation.

    Read more …

  • Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Learn how to structure IRUs for tax compliance and ensure your cable system capacity services are secure. Discover the key elements you need to include in your agreement to guarantee exclusive access and economic ownership rights.

    Read more …

  • Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Online gaming operators in Australia must abide by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth). Learn more about the rules and regulations, and the consequences when they are not followed.

    Read more …

  • Standard form IT procurement contracts – legal issues

    Standard form IT procurement contracts – legal issues

    Do you know what to look for in an IT procurement agreement? Learn more about the Queensland government QITC framework and key areas to consider when drafting or negotiating an agreement to protect your company’s commercial value.

    Read more …

Send this to a friend