Employment law for employers

Changes for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

HomePrivate: BlogCommercial lawEmployment law for employersChanges for casual employment – employer’s responsibilites

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

5–7 minutes

Changes affecting employers of casual employees came into effect on 27 March 2021 following the Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia’s Jobs and Economy Recovery Act 2021 (Cth) (Amendment).  The apparent intention of the Amendment is to strengthen the position of regular casual employees and establish more onerous obligations for employers.  Employers need to be aware of these changes to ensure they are not in breach of their new obligations.

How are employers of casuals affected?

The major changes for casual employees include:

  • an amended definition of casual employment;
  • a casual conversion opportunity, which is a new pathway for casuals to pursue a change of employment to either part-time of full time; and
  • the introduction of a requirement to provide a Casual Employment Information Statement (CEIS).

New definition of ‘casual employment’

The Amendment has added section 15A to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)(Act) which provides:

15A Meaning of casual employee

(1) A person is a casual employee of an employer if:

(a) An offer of employment made by the employer to the person is made on the basis that the employer makes no firm advance commitment to continuing and indefinite work according to an agreed pattern of work for the person; and
(b) The person accepts the offer on that basis; and
(c) The person is an employee as a result of that acceptance.

From the employer’s perspective, the most important aspect of this is ‘no firm advance commitment’.  Where it can be seen that a firm advance commitment exists, the employee will not be considered casual.  This is an important distinction.

Section 15(2) of the Act provides some guidance in determining what constitutes a ‘firm advance commitment’.  The following considerations assist in determining whether a ‘firm advance commitment’ exists:

  • whether the employer can elect to offer work and whether the person can elect to accept or reject work;
  • whether the person will work as required according to the needs of the employer;
  • whether the employment is described as casual employment; and
  • whether the person will be entitled to a casual loading or a specific rate of pay for casual employees under the terms of the offer or a fair work instrument.

The Act, in attempting to provide clarity in relation to these new considerations, provides further that:

  • a regular pattern of hours does not, on its own, indicate a firm advance commitment;[1] and
  • whether a person is a casual employee is to be assessed on the basis of the offer of employment and the acceptance of that offer, not on the basis of subsequent conduct of the parties.[2]

A casual employee will remain so until they undergo a casual conversion (described below) or accept an alternative offer of employment.[3]

What is a casual conversion?

Section 66B of the Act provides that an employer must, subject to some exceptions, make an offer to convert casual employees to either part-time or full-time employment, depending on their hours worked. Such an offer will be required in circumstances where:

  • the employee has been employed by the employer for a period of 12 months beginning the day the employment started; and
  • during at least the last 6 months of that period, the employee has worked a regular pattern of hours on an ongoing basis which, without significant adjustment, the employee could continue to work as a full-time or part-time employee, as the case may be.

Importantly, the offer must:

  • be in writing;
  • offer full-time or part-time employment; and
  • be provided to the employee within 21 days of the employee having worked for 12 months.

On acceptance of a casual conversion offer by the employee, the employer must, within 21 days, give written notice to the employee outlining the practical effect of the conversion.[4]  This notice confirms the employee’s conversion from casual to either part-time or full-time employment.[5]

Exceptions to the requirement to offer casual conversion

An offer for casual conversion will not be required in circumstances where there are reasonable grounds not to make the offer.[6]  These reasonable grounds must be based on facts that are known or reasonably foreseeable at the time of deciding not to make the offer, and may include:

  • the employee’s position will cease to exist in the period of 12 months after the time of deciding not to make the offer;
  • the hours of work which the employee is required to perform will be significantly reduced in that period;
  • there will be a significant change in the days or times at which the employee’s hours of work are required to be performed; or
  • making the offer would not comply with a recruitment or selection process required by or under a law of the Commonwealth or a State or a Territory.

Without doubt, in time, the Courts will find further circumstances constituting reasonable grounds not to make an offer as claims are brought before them.

It should be noted that an employer must not take steps, including the reduction or variance of an employee’s hours of work, or terminate an employee’s employment, in order to avoid the obligation to offer a casual conversion.[7]  Any reasonable grounds for not offering a casual conversion must occur “organically” and not as the result of deliberate strategy.

A further exception is the small business exception.  A small business employer will not be required to make an offer of casual conversion pursuant to section 66AA of the Act.  A small business employer is one that has fewer than 15 employees at a particular time.

Employer’s obligations to provide CEIS

The Fair Work Ombudsman has prepared and publish the CEIS containing information about casual employment and offers and requests for a casual conversion. As soon as practical after employing a casual, the employer must provide the employee with the CEIS, that can be downloaded here: Casual Employee Information Statement.

Links and further references

Fair Work Amendment (Supporting Australia’s Jobs and Economy Recovery Act 2021 (Cth)

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Further information about employer obligations

If you need advice on complying with your obligations as an employer, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:

[1] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 15A(3).
[2] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 15A(4).
[3] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 15A(5)(a) and (b).
[4] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 66E.
[5] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 66K.
[6] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 66C(a)(a).
[7] Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 66L.


Related insights about employer obligations

  • WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context

    The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…

    Read more …

  • Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    Mere puffery vs misleading and deceptive conduct – where is the line?

    In the case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (ACCC v TPG), the High Court of Australia (High Court) drew a distinction between mere puffery and representations with the intention of marketing.  This article explores the decision in ACCC v TPG and the distinction between puffery and…

    Read more …

  • Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    Federal Court dismisses continuous disclosure claim

    The Federal Court recently dismissed Australia Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) claim in Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Nuix Limited [2026] FCA 490 (ASIC v Nuix) that Nuix Limited breached its obligations under section 674 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).  Nuix Limited (Nuix) successfully contested ASIC’s allegation that it had breached…

    Read more …

  • Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Individual Flexibility Arrangements: an overview

    Modern awards and enterprise agreements set out the minimum terms and conditions of employment for most Australian workers performing different roles.  The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act) provides a mechanism by which an employer and an individual employee may, by agreement, adjust the operation of certain terms in their Award to better suit theircircumstances. …

    Read more …

  • Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    Coercive control and shareholder oppression

    The Criminal Law (Coercive Control and Affirmative Consent) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 (Qld) came into effect on 18 March 2024, by adding chapter 29A to the Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) (Criminal Code).  This chapter establishes a separate offence of “coercive control’, which stems from domestic violence offences and involves the use of…

    Read more …

  • Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    Overview of the Unfair Trading Practices Bill 2026

    On 1 April 2026, the Australian Government introduced the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Bill 2026 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) and Australian Consumer Law (ACL).[1]  If passed, the reform will take effect on 1 July 2027.  The Bill’s amendments aim to protect consumers from manipulative…

    Read more …

  • Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Does your start-up meet the ESIC tax-offset criteria?

    Federal government introduced the Tax Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives for Innovation) Act 2016 (Cth) to provide tax incentives for investors in an eligible early stage innovation company (ESIC), including 20% up-front non-refundable tax offset and capital gains tax (CGT) exemption for all types of investors meeting criteria.

    Read more …

  • White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    White-Anting: An employer’s lawful termination guide

    Employees who use White Anting tactics to deliberately undermine management or disrupt workplace harmony may be summarily dismissed, provided the relevant legal conditions are met and a proper process is followed.  Following our 28 April 2026 article “White Anting: serious misconduct?“, this article provides practical “how to” steps for employers to lawfully dismiss employees who…

    Read more …

  • White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within.  White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt.  White Anting  has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…

    Read more …

Send this to a friend