The substantive provisions of the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011 (Cth) (CDR Act) commenced by proclamation on 1 August 2011.
The objective of the CDR Act is to attempt to ensure that disputants take genuine steps to resolve a dispute before commencing civil proceedings in the Federal Court.
Section 4 of the Act provides that:
“…a person takes genuine steps to resolve a dispute if the steps taken by the person in relation to the dispute constitute a sincere and genuine attempt to resolve the dispute, having regard to the person’s circumstances and the nature and circumstances of the dispute”.
The section goes onto to describe steps that could be taken by a party to show that they had taken genuine steps:
- notifying the other person of the issues that are, or may be, in dispute, and offering to discuss them, with a view to resolving the dispute;
- responding appropriately to any such notification;
- providing relevant information and documents to the other person to enable the other person to understand the issues involved and how the dispute might be resolved;
- considering whether the dispute could be resolved by a process facilitated by another person, including an alternative dispute resolution process; and
- if such a process is agreed to:
(a) agreeing on a particular person to facilitate the process;
(b) attending the process;
(c) if such a process is conducted but does not result in resolution of the dispute -considering a different process; and
(d) attempting to negotiate with the other person, with a view to resolving some or all the issues in dispute, or authorising a representative to do so.
What is a Genuine Steps Statement?
On commencement of proceedings section 6 of the CDR Act provides that an applicant must file a Genuine Steps Statement.
The Genuine Steps Statement must specify:
- the steps that have been taken to resolve the dispute between the applicant and the respondent in the proceedings; or
- the reasons why no such steps were taken such as:
(a) the urgency of the proceedings;
(b) whether, and the extent to which, the safety or security of any person or property would have been compromised by taking such steps.
Section 7 of the CDR Act creates an obligation on the respondents to respond to the Genuine Steps Statement by:
- stating that the respondent agrees with the genuine steps statement filed by the applicant; or
- if the respondent disagrees in whole or part with the genuine steps statement filed by the applicant—specify the respect in which, and reasons why, the respondent disagrees.
Lawyers duty to assist their clients
A lawyer acting for either the applicant or the respondent must:
- advise the person of the need to file a genuine steps statement; and
- must assist them to comply with the requirements of the CDR Act.
Court Forms
In addition to the usual Federal Court Forms to commence proceedings a Genuine Steps Statement needs to be filed on Form 16.
Cease and desist letters in a post CDR Act world
The commencement of the CDR Act has changed the face of cease and desist letters as a pre-litigation dispute resolution technique as both the applicant and the respondent must show genuine steps towards resolving the dispute unless there is a genuine reason why steps were not taken.
Format of cease and desist letters
In order to establish that an applicant had taken genuine steps the format of cease and desist letters needs to change.
It would seem that cease and desist letters should now include the following statements:
- that the matter is without prejudice save as to costs and the CDR Act;
- the complainant’s position as holder of registered trademarks/patent/copyright or other matter that that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over;
- a request to meet to discuss the matter;
- a suggested meeting time;
- a request for further information which may be helpful in discussions or to resolve the dispute; and
- a guillotine clause by which time non-response or non-willingness to meet to discuss the matter will be deemed to mean that that the respondent is not cooperative and would prefer to deal with the matter in the Federal Court.
In this way, what would have been in the form of a traditional cease and desist letter may be turned into a request that can be used to satisfy section 7 of the CDR Act.
Further information
If you would like us to assist with litigation and dispute resolution, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about Federal Court litigation
-
What is standard discovery in Federal Court?
This article provides an in-depth look into the requirements of standard discovery in the Federal Court of Australia. Learn more about the relevance of documents, what constitutes ‘readily accessible’ documents, and relevant case law for narrowing the scope of discovery for a just resolution of disputes.
-
Inspection of documents in the Federal Court process
Document inspection in civil litigation before the Federal Court of Australia: rights of parties, rights of non-parties, court rules, and the two exceptions to presumption of access for non-parties.
-
Essentials for proving service in Federal Court
Applicants must serve documents on Respondent personally. If evaded, can apply for Deemed or Substituted Service, with proof of attempts, and leave to serve outside Australia if overseas.
-
Using discovery documents for other purposes
The Harman Undertaking, established in 1983, requires documents disclosed during civil litigation not to be used in other Court proceedings. This article examines exceptions, when same parties are involved, and suggests that special circumstances must be established to receive leave of the Court.
-
Federal Court – issuing subpoenas internationally
This article provides an overview of the rules and considerations to take into account when seeking to issue a subpoena to an overseas party in the Federal Court of Australia. It covers the need to take extra care when issuing a subpoena and the process for service of a subpoena internationally.
-
Security for costs in Federal Court
A Court may order a party to pay security for potential legal costs to their opponent. This article examines the law and considerations of the Federal Court in applications for security for costs.
-
Offers to settle: Federal Court Rules c.f. Calderbank offers
Settling out of Court can bring advantages, but parties must be aware of potential legal costs consequences of offers. Rejecting an offer unreasonably can lead to paying other’s costs or losing entitlement to costs.
-
Discovery process in the Federal Court of Australia
Discover the process for seeking documents in the Federal Court of Australia. Learn about the roles of the parties, criteria for standard and non-standard discovery, and the process of giving discovery. Get the full details on the Federal Court Rules 2011 and its revised regime for discovery.
