internet law

Dark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsDark fibre contracts for telecommunications providers

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

4–5 minutes

Dark fibre refers to access to ‘unlit’ (unused) telecommunications fibre.  Generally, large telecommunications carriers and government utilities (Supplier) have dark fibre networks laid out that can be available to carriage service providers (CSPs) to access to scale up their network.  Below we set out key elements of dark fibre and corresponding issues in telecommunications service agreements between CSPs and their business end users (End User).

Layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet compared dark fibre

Dark fibre exists in certain areas because Carriers have laid out more fibre optic infrastructure than needed.  The physical cables are then able to support CSPs who want their own connections.  In comparison, layer 2 or layer 3 ethernet service is used on a leased bandwidth basis.  The network is already activated and the CSP is not generally managing the connection or equipment.

Benefits of dark fibre

Dark fibre has many benefits, including:

  • Giving CSPs full control and freedom over their network, equipment and connection settings. The CSP can implement the type of transmission technology, protocols and features of the network and is a way of CSPs ‘building’ their own network with control over how it works, as the service won’t be shared with others;
  • Dark fibre also allows CSPs to upscale to suit the CSPs’ changing business needs. Consequently, data and speed capacities are only limited by the equipment the CSP uses over the dark fibre network;
  • Point-to-point connections are more reliable as they bypass the carriers core network routing and switching;
  • With linked point-to-point networks, data is highly secure and does not enter the public internet and the CSP can specify the security protocol and standards, including encryption standards and settings; and
  • Creating a network without buying the infrastructure.

Access to dark fibre

Access to dark fibre is a service with the underlying fibre-optic infrastructure leased or purchased from a Supplier.

Therefore, it is important to frame the licence granted to the End User to use the dark fibre service component.  End Users should ensure that that the licence gives them an exclusive licence to use a dark fibre circuit between two end points.  This ensures that the circuit is not shared and traffic impairment and latency is minimised.

Often Suppliers and CSP’s will allocate the fibre optic cores to be used in circuits on the condition that they have the discretion to modify, substitute, replace or relocate the path of the cores.  This can potentially cause service disruption for the End User, so the End User should ensure that advance notice of the change is given in order that the End User may make any required network changes.  The End User should also ensure that any change to the path of the cores can only be done if the standard of service is not materially reduced.

Service Levels

Service levels for dark fibre access provided by Supplier’s must be clearly stated, such as committed service availability and resolution times.  Service levels for a single path may be, say, 99.95%, however the End User should expect that service levels for the service which consists of multiple paths with complete physical separation should be higher, say 99.999%.

As dark fibre agreements are B2B, the End User should insist on service credits for failure to reach the service level availability target on a sliding scale dependent on the length of downtime.  In this sector, a significant downtime of, say, 4 hours in month with an availability of <99.5%, should carry with it a substantial service credit of around 50%.

From the Supplier’s perspective, it should exclude specified events from the calculation of service availability time, such as force majeure, failure of the End User’s equipment, planned maintenance, failure of third party upstream Suppliers and any permitted service suspension rights the CSP has.

Liability

CSPs should insist that the payment of any service credits is sole and exclusive remedy of the End User and exclude liability for any loss of profits, loss of business, loss of data incurred by the End User arising from the failure to achieve the service levels or provide the services.

Security and viruses

CSPs should clearly state that they do not have complete control over the security or content of data passing over the network and any systems operated by third parties.

Further, the CSP should clearly state that any property damage suffered by the End User, say damage to the End User equipment arising from a network virus, is limited and falls under the general liability cap.

Takeaways

Using dark fibre to provide a telecommunications service has many benefits, particularly around scalability, network control and reducing infrastructure spend, however Suppliers still need to ensure that there End User agreements limit their liability and risk exposure.

Links and further references

Legislation

Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth)

Further information about dark fibre agreements for telcos

If you need advice on Carrier to CSP dark fibre access agreements or CSP to End User telecommunications service agreements, please feel free to contact me for a confidential and obligation free discussion.


Related insights for telecommunication service providers

  • Data breach compliance and response plans

    Data breach compliance and response plans

    Dundas Lawyers create tailored data breach response plans to ensure compliance with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Plans include actions, registers, records, tests and tasks. Get an obligation-free and confidential discussion to learn more.

    Read more …

  • Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    Are email trackers admissible as evidence?

    The Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) is silent, but the Court considers email trackers and read receipts as evidence in civil and intellectual property litigation. As seen in Jaffari v Grabowski [2013] NSWCA 114, sender’s receipt of confirmation of email relay is a matter for the recipient.

    Read more …

  • Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    Is AI recognized as an inventor under the Patents Act 1990?

    The ruling of Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 has opened the door for artificial intelligence-created inventions to be eligible for patent protection. Learn more about the implications of this groundbreaking decision.

    Read more …

  • The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map – overview

    The Australian Cyber Law Map provides clarity on ever-changing legal landscape, covering commercial enterprises, cyber offences, infrastructure, international law, national security and personal rights. A source for understanding laws and providing safety/security in the digital age.

    Read more …

  • Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    Explaining Australia’s Media Bargaining Code

    The News Media Bargaining Code (NMBC) is quickly moving through Parliament and looks likely to become law. It requires digital platforms, such as Facebook and Google, to negotiate remuneration with News Companies for providing their media services. Non-compliance could result in hefty civil penalties.

    Read more …

  • My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    My client poached my software developers – what can I do?

    This article examines how professional service businesses can protect their investment in employees from clients poaching them. It looks at potential clauses such as client agreements, non-solicitation of employees, restraints of trade, confidential information, copyright and more.

    Read more …

  • Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    Patent granted for software tracking user actions

    A decision by Australian Patent Office provides insight into patentable subject matter for computer-implemented inventions. Case of Facebook, Inc. [2020] APO 19 is a successful example of technical improvement in computer-implemented method, resulting in patentability even with generic computer implementation.

    Read more …

  • Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Use of IRUs in a telecommunications capacity

    Learn how to structure IRUs for tax compliance and ensure your cable system capacity services are secure. Discover the key elements you need to include in your agreement to guarantee exclusive access and economic ownership rights.

    Read more …

  • Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth) overview

    Online gaming operators in Australia must abide by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth). Learn more about the rules and regulations, and the consequences when they are not followed.

    Read more …


Posted

in

,
Send this to a friend