The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has released its seventh report of the Digital Platform Services Inquiry and has invited submission from interested stakeholders by 5 April 2023. The information sought by the ACCC revolves around the activities of digital platform service providers use of strategies like bundling to limit competition and create technological lock-in. Information is also sought about the extent of penetration into the smart home devices, cloud storage sectors by Digital Platforms.
What is a digital platform ecosystem?
The ACCC defines digital platform ecosystem to mean:
“the wide range of interrelated products and services – whether interrelated through technical interoperability or by commercial practices such as bundling – offered by a single or related group of companies.”
What is the significance of digital platform services?
The ACCC acknowledges how some of the top digital service providers in the world such as Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook) and Microsoft are expanding the possible services that they may make available. This includes developing products in areas like AI, VR, virtual assistants, education, health, fitness, media streaming, home connected devices, gaming, clouds, and financial technology. The ACCC’s focus for submissions from stakeholders is on smart home devices and cloud storage.
The reason for seeking submission is to explore relationships between interconnected digital service platforms and any potential competition or consumer law issues that may arise.
What is the purpose of the inquiry?
The ACCC is aiming to investigate how expansive digital ecosystems may be potentially harmful to competition, consumerism, and business in general. The issued report acknowledges that whilst platform expansion can encourage competition, these global large providers can inhibit competitors from participating in the market and may limit the opportunity to create a competitive market. The inquiry aims to understand what specific consumer risks there are and their potential impact.
Some issues raised by ACCC include:
- Risk of dark patterns – when user interfaces (UIs) are made to confuse users and make it difficult to express their preferences.
- Certain ecosystems may limit choice for consumers (for example the fact that a consumer owns a Samsung phone limits them from buying an Apple Watch if they wish since the Apple Watch is only compatible with the iPhone).
You can find further information on the Digital Platform Services Inquiry and how to make a submission here: Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25. The ACCC encourages stakeholders to make submissions by 5 April 2023.
Links and further references
Digital platform services inquiry 2020-25
Further information about online business
If your business needs advice on compliance with any aspect of online business, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about online business
-
Apple and Google misused market power to monopolise app stores
On 12 August 2025, Justice Beach of the Federal Court of Australia (Court) delivered four (4) landmark judgments. The decisions of Epic Games, Inc & Anor v Apple Inc & Anor (EG v Apple) and Epic Games, Inc & Anor v Google LLC & Ors (EG v Google), together the (EG Cases), alongside Anthony &…
-
Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – artificial intelligence law
On 30 July 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss legal issues associated with the adoption of artificial intelligence.
-
How are Google and Microsoft implementing age verification?
From 27 December 2025, all ‘internet search engine services’ operating in Australia will be legally required to comply with Schedule 3 – Internet Search Engine Services Online Safety Code (Class 1C and Class 2 Material) (Code) registered under the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (eSafety Act). The Code, registered by the eSafety Commissioner on 27…
-
Risks when implementing retrieval-augmented generation systems
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is an artificial intelligence (AI) system architecture that combines large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-4, with external data retrieval processes.
-
What is the US Take It Down Act?
The Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act (Take It Down Act ) is a United States (US) federal law enacted on 19 May 2025. The Take It Down Act amends 47 U.S. Code § 223 (Code) of the Communications Act 1934 (US) (Communications Act) by establishing new…
-
QITC IT contracts framework an introduction
In August 2017, the Queensland Government introduced the Queensland Information Technology Contracting (QITC). The QITC framework replaces the Government Information Technology Contracting (GITC) framework. It was designed for the purpose of guiding all Queensland Government Information and Communications Technology (ICT) contracts.
-
Damages for misleading conduct by competitors under ACL
Section 236 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) entitles any person, including corporations – to claim compensation for loss or damage suffered from misleading or deceptive conduct. The High Court has developed numerous general principles for assessing loss or damage which we will discuss in this article.
-
Federal parliament enacts cyber security legislation
On 25 November 2024, the Australian Parliament passed a suite of legislation, collectively referred to by the Australian Government as the Cyber Security Legislative Package 2024. The purported impetus for this legislation was a series of high-profile data breaches in 2022 and 2023.
-
Domain name disputes – a summary of the process
A domain name is a string of text that maps to an alphanumeric IP address, enabling users to access websites through client-side software.[1] Domains can be valuable business assets, and they frequently become the subject of disputes regarding the legitimacy of their registration among organisations with competing rights.
