On 13 October 2011, the Federal Government introduced new tax legislation into Parliament.
The Proposed legislation increases directors’ personal liabilities for non-compliance with Pay As You Go (PAYG) withholding tax and Superannuation Guarantee Charge (SGC) contributions and also increases the Australian Tax Office’s (ATO) powers. The new law is aimed at protecting employees against phoenix company activity. It is important to note that fraud or dishonesty of the companies, directors, or associates is not an element, therefore inadvertent errors and/or mischaracterisations of payments are included.
The proposed changes
Under the Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 8 ) Bill 2011 (Bill), the SGC contributions and PAYG withholding tax liability of a company will:
- make directors personally liable for unpaid SGC contributions and for unremitted PAYG withholding tax;
- continue to follow the directors even after their resignation, liquidation of the company, or establishing a new entity;
- assign to any subsequent directors who become a director within fourteen (14) days after the due date of the SGC or PAYG; and
- potentially personally expose liability to family members and other associates of the directors.
The Bill gives the ATO additional recovery powers which include:
- the ability to commence action which could include third party garnishee orders, commencing debt recovery proceedings or commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, without issuing a director’s penalty notice (DPN) or any other notice, where a company fails to comply with its SGC liability or PAYG obligations or is unpaid for more than three (3) months after the due date; and
- where the company omits to pay SGC or PAYG withheld amounts, directors and their associates could have their own PAYG withholding credits denied.
A common mistake is misidentifying employees as contractors. Therefore, the company should review their SGC and PAYG compliance procedures and policies to ensure they are comprehensive and adequate.
Further information
Dundas Lawyers assists with directors duties. To ascertain how Dundas Lawyers can assist you, contact us for a confidential and obligation-free discussion:
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,LL.M.,MQLS.
Legal Practice Director
T: +61 7 3221 0013 (preferred)
M: +61 419 726 535
E: mburrows@dundaslawyers.com.au
Disclaimer
This article contains general commentary only. You should not rely on the commentary as legal advice. Specific legal advice should be obtained to ascertain how the law applies to your particular circumstances.
Related insights about corporate compliance
-
WIJOAV v Goldstone – shareholder oppression in a private equity context
The recent case of WIJOAV Services Pty Ltd v Goldstone Private Equity Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 622 (WIJOAV v Goldstone) involved a claim of shareholder oppression under section 232 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act). The case established that a shareholder in a private equity fund may be oppressed by a co-investor where…
-
Directors’ obligations to comply with Accounting Standards
Directors are personally liable for ensuring their company operates in accordance with corporate governance and accounting standards. Obligations contained in part 2M.2 and 2M.3 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) outline obligations for companies to keep financial records and prepare annual financial and director’s reports. Sections 180 and 344 of the Corporations Act…
-
Are fiduciary duties owed by former company directors?
A former director’s duties and responsibilities to their previous company may not end with their resignation. Find out how the Advanced Fuels Technology Pty Ltd v Blythe & Ors [2018] VSC 286 case explored this concept and what the Court had to say.
-
Company funds must be used for company purposes
This article examines the legal principles behind when it is permissible to use company funds, focusing on the case of Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ASCR 559, which established that company funds must only be used for company purposes and not to pay for legal costs of proceedings for the…
-
Director’s duties – the case of MG Corrosion Consultants PL v Gilmour
The case of MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 990 serves as a reminder of the need for Directors to uphold their obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Uncover the Courts findings and the implications for Directors.
-
Director Identification Numbers – more red tape?
Treasury Laws Amendment Bill proposes a Director Identification Number (DIN) regime to create transparency, detect illegal phoenix activity, and provide streamlined system for liquidators/administrators. Consultation closes 26 Oct 2018.
-
Director’s personal liability – misleading & deceptive conduct
Directors: prevention is cheaper than cure! Explore ways to ensure your corporation doesn’t engage in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Take active steps to protect yourself from personal liability.
-
Director loans – can they be recalled anytime?
This article explores the legal considerations of when loans between family members or directors of a company are due and payable on demand. Learn more about the relevant case law and express terms that may be implied by conduct.
-
Can a third party be held accountable for breaching director duties?
This article examines how the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) holds third parties “knowingly involved” in director misconduct accountable. Learn more about the tests, cases, and damages that can result from company business gone wrong.
