Corporate law Brisbane

Electronic document execution by directors

HomePrivate: BlogLegal insightsElectronic document execution by directors

by

reviewed by

Malcolm Burrows

Reading Time:

3–5 minutes

Because of the current COVID-19 restrictions, it has been inconvenient and even impossible (in some cases) for directors to sign documents in what’s known as “wet-ink”.  In order to address this issue the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 (Cth) (Determination) has been published by the Federal Government.  The Determination modifies the operation of section 127 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) and other legislation in relation to the conduct of meetings and the execution of documents by companies.  The meaning of “Document” has been amended to include a document in electronic form.

Changes to method of execution of documents by companies

Section 6 of the Determination modifies subsection 127(1) of the Act by defining a document as one that can be in electronic form.  Subsection 6(3) and (4) provide:

(3)  A company may also execute a document without using a common seal if each person specified in paragraph 127(1)(a), (b) or (c), as the case requires, of the Act either:

(a)  signs a copy or counterpart of the document that is in a physical form; or
(b)  complies with subsection (4) of this section in relation to an electronic communication (within the meaning of the Electronic Transactions Act 1999).

The copy, counterpart or electronic communication must include the entire contents of the document, but need not include the signature of another person signing the document nor any material included in the document because of subsection (4) of this section.

(4)  A person complies with this subsection if:

(a)  a method is used to identify the person in the electronic communication and to indicate the person’s intention in respect of the contents of the document; and
(b)  the method:

(i)  is as reliable as appropriate for the purpose for which the company is executing the document, in light of all the circumstances, including any relevant agreement; or
(ii)  is proven in fact to have fulfilled the functions described in paragraph (a), by itself or together with further evidence.

According to the Explanatory Statement to the Determination the electronic signature of a document by a company officer can be completed by:

pasting a copy of a signature into a document;

signing PDF documents with a finger or stylus on a smartphone, tablet or laptop; or

using a cloud-based signature platforms like DocuSign.[1]

The Explanatory Statement also states that:

signatories do not need to sign the same physical document. Instead, a document could be signed and scanned by the first signatory and then printed and signed by the second signatory, or separate electronic signatures could be applied to fully electronic versions of the document.  If these elements are satisfied, then an electronic signature applied under section 127 will be effective to execute a document.[2]

This means that most of the contracts signed during the period covered by the Determination will acquire the benefits of the assumptions, as listed in section 129(5).  The Determination applies on a temporary basis until 6 November 2020.

Split Execution

For purposes of section 127(1) of the Act, the Determination also provides for company officers to sign various copies of the same document.  This modification means a document is allowed to be signed and scanned by the first signatory and then printed and signed by the second signatory, or separate electronic signatures could be applied to fully electronic copies of the document.  This enabled flexibility for each respective company officers to sign their own copy or counter part of the document in different locations.

Do these changes apply to deeds?

Uncertainty arises as to whether the modification of the common law position applies to physical deeds.  It is noted that there is no explicit reference made to deeds in the Determination.  The Explanatory Statement has however indicated that section 127 of the Act is modified to ‘allow use of an electronic signature to meet requirements for a signature’ with no specifications of the type of document to which this modified rule takes in effect. The modified rules set out by the Determination were made by the Treasurer on 5 May 2020 and came into effect on 6 May 2020.

Takeaways

Practical relief for the requirement of companies executing documents is provided under section 127(1) of the Act, where document signing process for company officers are simplified.  These changes made by the Determination apply for six months and will be repealed on 6 November 2020.

Legislation

Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 (Cth)

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Explanatory Statement to the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020

Cases

Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited (ACN 068 049 178) & Ors v Kenneth Ross Pickard & Anor [2019] SASC 123

Further information

If you need assistance with the legal practicalities of doing business, please telephone me for an obligation free and confidential discussion.

[1] Explanatory Statement to the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 page 4, para 2.

[2] Explanatory Statement to the Corporations (Coronavirus Economic Response) Determination (No. 1) 2020 page 4, para 2.


Related insights

  • White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting: serious misconduct?

    White Anting is an Australian term meaning to sabotage, undermine, or destroy an organisation, project, or person from within.  White Anting in the workplace often involves the quiet, insidious undermining of a colleague or superior through gossip, withholding information, exclusion, or spreading doubt.  White Anting  has been recognised by psychologists as a psychosocial hazard and…

    Read more …

  • ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    ACCC publishes guidance on cash acceptance industry codes

    From 1 January 2026, new cash acceptance obligations have commenced under industry codes applying to supermarkets and fuel retailers, overseen by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).  In March 2026, the ACCC published guidance on these newly enforced regulations, reminding retailers to consider their obligations before penalties apply on 1 July 2026.

    Read more …

  • ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    ESS vs ESOP – what’s the difference?

    Employee share schemes (ESS) and employee share option plans (ESOP) are commonly used by corporations to incentivise employees and align performance with company growth by providing them with an interest in the company.  While the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct legal and structural differences under Australian law.  This article explains the key…

    Read more …

  • AI businesses should have duty of care

    AI businesses should have duty of care

    In a recent interview with InnovationAus.com, Victorian Senator Michelle Ananda-Rajah (Senator) emphasised the need to adopt digital duty of care laws for artificial intelligence (AI) companies.[1]  As a representative of the ALP and former AI start-up founder, the Senator calls for the proposed digital duty of care to apply to AI companies.  If implemented, the…

    Read more …

  • Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    Disputed ESOP – Selak v National Tiles Co Pty Ltd

    In the case of Selak v National Tiles, the Vic Supreme Court considered whether a company breached an option agreement governed by the terms of an Employee Share Option Plan (ESOP) by requiring an option holder to execute an undisclosed shareholders’ agreement as a condition of exercising vested options.  

    Read more …

  • Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    Federal Court orders winding up of crypto mining investment scheme

    The Federal Court of Australia delivered judgment in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v NGS Crypto Pty Ltd (No 5) [2025] FCA 1611, on 18 December 2025 ordering the winding up of two (2) cryptocurrency related entities after finding that they operated an unlicensed financial services business and an unregistered managed investment scheme in contravention…

    Read more …

  • Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Online Safety – is your online business a DIS or a RES?

    Whether your online business has to comply with the obligations contained in the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (OSA), and related standards and industry codes will largely depend on how your business is classified because of the functionality it provides to end users in Australia.

    Read more …

  • Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    Bill to allow victims of AI deepfakes to sue for emotional damages

    On 24 November 2025, Senator David Pocock introduced a private Senator’s bill, the Online Safety and Other Legislation Amendment (My Face, My Rights) Bill 2025 (Cth) (Bill) to amend the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) (Online Safety Act) and the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act). 

    Read more …

  • Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    Malcolm Burrows on ABC’s “Legal Eagles” segment – Deepfakes

    On 3 December 2025, Malcolm Burrows appeared live on Katherine Feeney’s ABC Radio program, “Legal Eagles” as the Technology and Intellectual Property Lawyer to discuss the proposed amendments to the Online Safety Act 2021 (Cth) through the introduction of the Online Safety and other legislation Amendment (My Face Rights) Bill (Cth) 2025 (My Face Rights…

    Read more …


Send this to a friend